History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
The preliminaries of this important treaty were signed on the night of
the 1st of October, and a courier was despatched to Paris, with a view
to make the public announcement simultaneously to the people on both
sides of the Channel. The public joy both in France and England was
of the most exciting character, as the negotiations, which had been
carried on during nine months, had been kept profoundly secret up to
the last moment. Napoleon and his colleagues, the other two consuls,
Cambacérès and Lebrun, received the news at a cabinet council, and
they embraced each other with undisguised delight. In this moment of
satisfaction Cambacérès remarked, “Now that we have made peace with
England, we have only to conclude a treaty of commerce, and all cause
for future dissension between the two countries will be removed.”
[Sidenote: Bonaparte’s opinion of free-trade.]
“Not quite so fast,” rejoined the First Consul, with some energy. “A
political peace is concluded; so much the better, let us enjoy it. As
regards a commercial peace, we will make one if we can. But I will not
on any consideration whatever sacrifice French industry. I remember the
distress of 1786.”[250]
Treaties of peace were now formed between all the nations of the
continent, and peace caused deeper public emotion in all ranks of
people throughout Europe than perhaps any event which had happened for
many centuries.
But this peace, in which so many millions of people rejoiced, was of
short duration. Having by the treaties of Luneville and Amiens[251]
raised himself and France to the highest power and influence in
Europe, Napoleon had now constituted himself consul for life; had
restored the national religion to France, established tranquillity and
good government in all the departments of the state, reorganised the
finances, previously in a deplorable confusion; and had finally, with
Prussia, secularised the ecclesiastical states of Germany, mediatised
a number of smaller German princes, and parcelled out a large portion
of Europe in the most arbitrary, though in some respects judicious
manner. In a word, he had raised himself and France to the highest
pitch of political influence, and only wanted the name of emperor,
which in a year or two afterwards he assumed to be, in every sense the
most powerful potentate in Europe. The world was dazzled with a success
which, until that period, had been combined with many acts of profound
wisdom. But this remarkable man, who could so well govern the unquiet
spirit of France, could not govern himself—
“Oh! happy he who wisely can
Govern that little empire, man.”
Ere long his rage for power and distinction again involved all
Europe in one of the most sanguinary wars recorded in the history of
the world, a war which only terminated after the final struggle at
Waterloo, and in the exile for ever of the Emperor from the scene of
his glory.
[Sidenote: Sequestrations of English property in France not raised.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account