History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
History
History of merchant shipping and ancient commerce, Volume 2 (of 4)
Lindsay, W. S. (William Schaw)
Commerce -- History; Shipping -- History; Steam navigation -- History
The most important of the British Orders in Council, as we have seen,
bore date 11th November, 1807, the Milan Decree following on the 17th
of December of the same year; but the Americans, having been apprised
of the intentions of the English government, adopted precautionary
measures by imposing a general embargo from and after the 22nd of
December, 1807.[289] Nothing can prove more conclusively how unpopular
this step was among the shipowners of the United States than the fact
that every vessel in the foreign trade which heard the intelligence
kept out of their ports, preferring to run the risk of capture rather
than lose their share of the enormous profits they were making in their
neutral bottoms, by a clandestine trade with France and England. The
American government clearly foresaw that the extreme measures adopted
by both belligerents would annihilate their foreign carrying trade,
and restore to England that power and its accompanying commercial
advantages, which her maritime superiority had already conferred on her
in the great contest in which she was engaged.
[Sidenote: Policy of Napoleon towards neutrals.]
[Sidenote: Non-intercourse Act.]
One of the objects of Napoleon by his decrees was evidently to prey
upon the known susceptibility of the Americans, and to urge them,
on the pretence of the independence of their flag, to resist the
executive authority exercised by England, whether with regard to the
right of neutrals, the right of search, or the impressment of American
seamen, all fruitful sources of complaint on the part of the American
government. Nor had he, indeed, unwilling listeners, for the Americans,
in their diplomatic proceedings, exhibited an unequivocal tendency
to favour Napoleon. Although statements were made in Parliament that
the Americans would have joined England in the war against France if
she would have consented to rescind the Orders in Council as regarded
their shipping, all these allegations were unfortunately at variance
with the truth, and were, in fact, only put forward by interested
English merchants who could no longer avail themselves of American
bottoms to carry on their trade. Finding their embargo inoperative, as
American vessels preferred an adventurous commerce and large profits
to a ruinous inaction, the United States government removed it; but
as the European governments were inflexible in their policy, they
immediately afterwards passed the Act of Non-Intercourse,[290] by which
all commercial interchanges with France and England were prohibited;
the result being the Rambouillet Decree, issued by Napoleon on the 23rd
of March, 1810, which ordered that all American vessels and cargoes
arriving in any of the ports of France or of countries occupied by
French troops, should be seized and condemned.
[Sidenote: Secret terms with America.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account