History of Mexico, Volume 1, 1516-1521Bancroft, Hubert Howe
History
History of Mexico, Volume 1, 1516-1521
Bancroft, Hubert Howe
Mexico -- History
[193] According to Bernal Diaz, _Hist. Verdad._, 30,
gold played an important role in effecting this change of
allegiance, termed by Velazquez, in his Memorials to Spain,
a witchery. Solis sees nothing but the dignified yet clever
traits of his hero in all this.
[194] The soldiers called them Lopelucios, because their
first inquiry was Lopelucio, ‘chief,’ whom they wished to
see. They had not ventured to approach while the Mexicans
were at the camp. _Bernal Diaz_, _Hist. Verdad._, 28.
[195] According to Gomara, followed by Herrera, the Totonacs
were about twenty in number, and came while Teuhtlile was
absent on his second mission to Mexico, without bringing
a direct invitation to the Spaniards. _Hist. Mex._, 43-4.
[196] See _Native Races_, v. 475-7.
[197] _Ixtlilxochitl_, _Hist. Chich._, 288. This author
is not very careful, however, and his desire to court
the Spaniards has no doubt led him to antedate the event.
Brasseur de Bourbourg accepts his story in full. _Hist. Nat.
Civ._, iv. 87-8. A similar revelation is claimed to have
been made by two Aztec chiefs, Vamapantzin and Atonaltzin,
who came to the camp in the retinue of the first messengers
from Mexico. Descendants of the early Aztec kings, and
discontented with the present ruler, they promised Cortés
to deliver certain native paintings foretelling the coming
of white men, to reveal the whereabouts of the imperial
treasures, and to plot an uprising among native states in
aid of Spaniards. For these services they received extensive
grants after the conquest, including that of Ajapusco town.
The document recording this is a fragment which Zerecero
parades in the opening part of his _Mem. Rev. Méx._, 8-14,
as a discovery by him in the Archivo General. It pretends
to be a title to Ajapusco lands, and contains on the first
pages a letter signed by Cortés at San Juan de Ulua, ‘20
March,’ 1519, as ‘Captain-general and governor of these
New Spains.’ Both the date and titles stamp the letter at
least as more than suspicious.
[198] The natives called it Citlaltepetl, starry mountain,
with reference probably to the sparks issuing from it. For
height, etc., see _Humboldt_, _Essai Pol._, i. 273. Brasseur
de Bourbourg gives it the unlikely name of Ahuilizapan.
_Hist. Nat. Civ._, iv. 99. The ending ‘pan’ implies a
district or town, not a mountain. The description in _Carta
del Ayunt._, in _Cortés_, _Cartas_, 22-3, expresses doubt
whether the whiteness of the summit is due to snow or to
clouds.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account