History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)Ticknor, George
History
History of Spanish Literature, vol. 2 (of 3)
Ticknor, George
Spanish literature -- History and criticism
But this is all that can interest us about the book, which, if not
without merit in some respects, is generally low and dull, and would
now be forgotten, if it were not connected with the fame of Don
Quixote. In its Preface, Cervantes is treated with coarse indignity,
his age, his sufferings, and even his honorable wounds, being sneered
at;[181] and in the body of the book, the character of Don Quixote,
who appears as a vulgar madman, fancying himself to be Achilles, or
any other character that happened to occur to the author,[182] is
so completely without dignity or consistency, that it is clear the
writer did not possess the power of comprehending the genius he at
once basely libelled and meanly attempted to supplant. The best parts
of the work are those in which Sancho is introduced; the worst are its
indecent stories and the adventures of Barbara, who is a sort of brutal
caricature of the graceful Dorothea, and whom the knight mistakes for
Queen Zenobia.[183] But it is almost always wearisome, and comes to a
poor conclusion by the confinement of Don Quixote in a mad-house.[184]
[181] “Tiene mas lengua que manos,” says Avellaneda, coarsely.
[182] Chapter 8;--just as he makes Don Quixote fancy a poor
peasant in his melon-garden to be Orlando Furioso (c. 6);--a
little village to be Rome (c. 7);--and its decent priest
alternately Lirgando and the Archbishop Turpin. Perhaps the most
obvious comparison, and the fairest that can be made, between the
two Don Quixotes is in the story of the goats, told by Sancho,
in the twentieth chapter of the First Part in Cervantes, and
the story of the geese, by Sancho, in Avellaneda’s twenty-first
chapter, because the latter professes to improve upon the former.
The failure to do so, however, is obvious enough.
[183] The whole story of Barbara, beginning with Chapter 22, and
going nearly through the remainder of the work, is miserably
coarse and dull.
[184] In 1824, a curious attempt was made, probably by some
ingenious German, to add two chapters more to Don Quixote, as if
they had been suppressed when the Second Part was published. But
they were not thought worth printing by the Spanish Academy. See
Don Quixote, ed. Clemencin, Tom. VI. p. 296.
Cervantes evidently did not receive this affronting production until
he was far advanced in the composition of his Second Part; but in the
fifty-ninth chapter, written apparently when it first reached him, he
breaks out upon it, and from that moment never ceases to persecute it,
in every form of ingenious torture, until, in the seventy-fourth, he
brings his own work to its conclusion. Even Sancho, with his accustomed
humor and simplicity, is let loose upon the unhappy Aragonese; for,
having understood from a chance traveller who first brings the book to
their knowledge, that his wife is called in it Mary Gutierrez, instead
of Teresa Panza,--
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account