History of Taxation in Rhode Island to the Year 1790Gardner, Henry B. (Henry Brayton)
History
History of Taxation in Rhode Island to the Year 1790
Gardner, Henry B. (Henry Brayton)
Taxation -- Rhode Island -- History
Houses and buildings of all kinds, including those used for
manufacturing purposes, were to be estimated at fifteen years rental,
horses and other farming stock at full value. Debts might be deducted
from the personal estate if the "Committee shall think the same best".
The committee were given power to examine on oath and to send for papers
and records. If any person refused to testify or give an account of his
estate, he was to be taxed two fold in the next colony rate. No colony
tax was to be levied until the valuation was made and approved, when it
was to be the standard for the apportionment of taxes until a new
estimate was taken. A protest was entered signed by eight members
asserting that twenty years purchase was an over valuation of land,
while fifteen years purchase was no higher than, if indeed it was so
high as, the real value of houses and buildings, and that unimproved
land as it yielded no profit, should not be taxed. Land holders, it was
claimed, would bear a much larger share of the public burdens than in
justice they ought in proportion to the merchants and traders.
The report of the committee as at first presented was subjected to
careful re-examination and correction. The final result was reported and
accepted in February, 1769, and the estimate was declared to be "the Law
and Rule for future Taxation." The estimate as adopted contained the
following items:
Acres of woodland 241,685-3/4
Value of woodland £236,946-5-6
Rent at 20 and 15 years 1,356,830-16
Sum total of ratables of each town 517,578-9-1
-------------
Total 2,111,356-0-7
Polls 8,952.
Protests against apportionments under the estimate were few. From
October, 1774, to March, 1777, no tax was levied. When it was found
necessary to resume taxation a committee was appointed to consider the
changes which had occurred in each town since 1769, and agree upon a new
basis of apportionment. The committee completed its work in one day, and
made a report containing an estimate which was accepted as a temporary
standard. The total valuation of the new estimate was only a few pounds
greater than that of eight years before. The island towns, then in
possession of the enemy, were relieved at the expense of the main land,
the most important change being the removal of £100,000 from the
valuation of Newport and the placing of it on Providence, increasing the
valuation of the latter town by nearly eighty per cent. Providence, in
its desire to further the resumption of taxation, accepted this large
addition, but only on condition that it should not become a precedent.
The General Assembly however showed no desire to take a new estimate and
continued to apportion taxes in accordance with the estimate of March,
1777.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account