History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
The most probable explanation of the affair seems to be that Guatemozin
was a troublesome and, indeed, formidable captive. Thus much is
intimated by Cortés himself, in his Letter to the emperor.[215] The
fallen sovereign of Mexico, by the ascendency of his character, as well
as by his previous station, maintained an influence over his countrymen
which would have enabled him with a breath, as it were, to rouse their
smothered, not extinguished, animosity into rebellion. The Spaniards,
during the first years after the Conquest, lived in constant
apprehension of a rising of the Aztecs. This is evident from numerous
passages in the writings of the time. It was under the same apprehension
that Cortés consented to embarrass himself with his royal captive on
this dreary expedition. And in such distrust did he hold him that, even
while in Mexico, he neither rode abroad, nor walked to any great
distance, according to Gomara, without being attended by
Guatemozin.[216]
Parties standing in such relations to each other could have been the
objects only of mutual distrust and aversion. The forlorn condition of
the Spaniards on the present march, which exposed them in a peculiar
degree to any sudden assault from their wily Indian vassals, increased
the suspicions of Cortés. Thus predisposed to think ill of Guatemozin,
the general lent a ready ear to the first accusation against him.
Charges were converted into proofs, and condemnation followed close upon
the charges. By a single blow he proposed to rid himself and the state
forever of a dangerous enemy,--the more dangerous, that he was an enemy
in disguise. Had he but consulted his own honor and his good name,
Guatemozin’s head was the last on which he should have suffered an
injury to fall. “He should have cherished him,” to borrow the homely
simile of his encomiast, Gomara, “like gold in a napkin, as the best
trophy of his victories.”[217]
Whatever may have been the real motives of his conduct in this affair,
it seems to have left the mind of Cortés but ill at ease. For a long
time he was moody and irritable, and found it difficult to sleep at
night. On one occasion, as he was pacing an upper chamber of a
_teocalli_ in which he was quartered, he missed his footing in the dark,
and was precipitated from a height of some twelve feet to the ground,
which occasioned him a severe contusion on the head,--a thing too
palpable to be concealed, though he endeavored, says the gossiping Diaz,
to hide the knowledge of it, as well as he could, from the
soldiers.[218]
It was not long after the sad scene of Guatemozin’s execution that the
wearied troops entered the head town of the great province of Aculan; a
thriving community of traders, who carried on a profitable traffic with
the farthest quarters of Central America. Cortés notices in general
terms the excellence and beauty of the buildings, and the hospitable
reception which he experienced from the inhabitants.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account