History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4Prescott, William Hickling
History
History of the Conquest of Mexico; vol. 4/4
Prescott, William Hickling
Cortés, Hernán, 1485-1547; Mexico -- History -- Conquest, 1519-1540
It is open to another objection, when, as it frequently does, it
violates the propriety of costume. Nothing is more difficult than
to preserve the keeping of the piece when the new is thus laid on
the old,--the imitation of the antique on the antique itself. The
declamations of Solís are much prized as specimens of eloquence.
But they are too often misplaced; and the rude characters in whose
mouths they are inserted are as little in keeping with them as were
the Roman heroes with the fashionable wig and sword with which they
strutted on the French stage in Louis the Fourteenth’s time.
As to the value of the researches made by Solís in the compilation
of his work it is not easy to speak, for the page is supported by
none of the notes and references which enable us to track the
modern author to the quarry whence he has drawn his materials. It
was not the usage of the age. The people of that day, and, indeed,
of preceding times, were content to take the author’s word for his
facts. They did not require to know why he affirmed this thing or
doubted that; whether he built his story on the authority of a
friend or of a foe, of a writer of good report or of evil report.
In short, they did not demand a reason for their faith. They were
content to take it on trust. This was very comfortable to the
historian. It saved him a world of trouble in the process, and it
prevented the detection of error, or, at least, of negligence. It
prevented it with all who did not carefully go over the same ground
with himself. They who have occasion to do this with Solís will
probably rise from the examination with no very favorable idea of
the extent of his researches; they will find that, though his
situation gave him access to the most valuable repositories in the
kingdom, he rarely ascends to original documents, but contents
himself with the most obvious and accessible; that he rarely
discriminates between the contemporary testimony and that of later
date; in a word, that in all that constitutes the _scientific_
value of history he falls far below his learned predecessor
Herrera,--rapid as was the composition of this last.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account