He begins by saying, that the rules and orders of this act were not so much regarded as he could wish, which he ascribes to there being no penalties in it. The trees were rinded, and the woods destroyed, as much as before passing the act; and in a few years, he thought there would not be a stick left fit for the use of the fishery within five or six miles of that, or other harbours. The flakes that were left standing, were most of them made use of by the inhabitants for firing in the winter. He says, the then admiral of the harbour of St. John’s, _Captain Arthur Holdsworth_, of Dartmouth, brought over from England, that fishing season, two hundred and thirty-six passengers, all or great part of which were _bye boat-keepers_, and they were brought, under a pretence of being freighters aboard his ship, though it was only for some few provisions for their necessary use. These persons he had put and continued in the most convenient stages, &c. in the harbour, which all along, since the year 1685, had belonged to fishing ships; in so much, that several masters of fishing ships had been obliged to hire rooms of the planters. These bye boat-keepers were most of them, he says, able fishermen, and there was not one fresh man, or green man, amongst them, as the act requires. He says, that this person, and one or two more, who constantly used the fishery, made it their business in the beginning of the year, to ride from one market town to another in the west of England, on purpose to get passengers; with whom they made an agreement, that in case they should happen to be admirals of any of the harbours, they would put and continue Mr. Holdsworth, and such persons, in fishing ships’ rooms. This, he says, was a very great abuse and discouragement to the adventurers: besides, these bye boat-keepers could afford to sell their fish cheaper than the adventurers, which must lessen the number of fishing ships.