History of the government of the island of Newfoundland: With an appendix containing the Acts of Parliament made respecting the trade and fisheryReeves, John
History
History of the government of the island of Newfoundland: With an appendix containing the Acts of Parliament made respecting the trade and fishery
Reeves, John
Fisheries -- Newfoundland and Labrador -- Newfoundland, Island of; Newfoundland, Island of (N.L.) -- Politics and government
Another question, as to the right of property at Newfoundland, arose
upon a _salmon fishery_, which had been carried on and improved by _Mr.
Skeffington_, between _Cape Bonavista_ and _Cape John_, in a part never
frequented by any fishing ships; he had cleared the country up the rivers
for forty miles, and had built houses and stages. This person applied
for an exclusive grant of this fishery for a term of years;—the matter
being referred to _Mr. West_, he reported, that such a grant would not be
inconsistent with the stat. 10 and 11 Will. 3[30]. The board accordingly
recommended to his majesty, that a term of 21 years, in a sole fishery
for salmon, in _Fresh-water Bay_, _Ragged Harbour_, _Gander Bay_, and
_Dog Creek_, might very well be granted by his majesty, with liberty to
cut wood and timber in the parts adjacent, provided it were at six miles
distant from the shore[31].
In the close of the year 1728, we find the board of trade once more
took up the subject of this trade and fishery, in consequence of the
representations made by _Lord Vere Beauclerck_, the commodore on that
station. In order to bring the subject under full discussion, they caused
letters to be written to the chief magistrates of the different towns
in the west, requesting the merchants to send their thoughts, whether
any thing, and what, might be done for the further encouragement of the
fishery.
[Sidenote: Opinion on Sec. 7, of Stat. 10 and 11 Will 3.]
With a view of understanding the situation and tenure by which persons
held their lands in Newfoundland, the board referred, at this time, a
question to _Mr. Fane_ on the seventh clause of stat. 10 and 11 Will 3.
“Whether the possessors had an inheritance therein, or only an estate for
life?” and he was of opinion, that by the words of this clause, an estate
for life only passed to the possessors, and consequently a right of
alienation only for that interest, for the following reasons:—1st. From
the general rule of law, that the king’s right and interest can never be
bound by general words—2dly. From the inconvenience that would ensue,
if by these general words an estate of inheritance should be construed
to be given; for these houses, &c. might fall into hands improper for
carrying on the fishery, or be bought by such as are in the interest of
our enemies; or such new erections, houses, &c. might be purchased by
one person, or two, and so an engrossing established, against the design
and intention of the act—3dly. From the words of the clause, which seem
to confine the possession to the builder; for the act says, _to_ HIS
_or_ THEIR _use_; which implies, as he apprehended, that this is only
a personal privilege; and a privilege it was sufficient, to have an
estate for life in a house, &c. probably slightly built; and which, in
all likelihood, would only last for the life of the builder—4thly. This
act was made, he apprehended, in disfavour of the Newfoundland-men; and
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account