History of the Peninsular War, Volume 6 (of 6)Southey, Robert
History
History of the Peninsular War, Volume 6 (of 6)
Southey, Robert
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The course of events, and the false position in
which he found himself, so contrary, he said, to the rectitude and
loyalty of his character, had greatly injured his health: he was
growing old; nothing but honour and duty could detain him where he was,
and his inclination would drive him away, unless the Emperor explained
himself in a different manner from what he had hitherto done. There
was also a letter to his brother Louis, expressing a hope to see him
one day in good health, and with the happiness which arises from a
good conscience.... That happiness the intrusive king Joseph might
well envy! It is little excuse for him that he was more weak than
wicked, and in mere weakness had consented to be made the instrument
of his brother’s insatiable ambition. Even in these letters, where he
manifested a full sense of his humiliating situation, no consciousness
is expressed of its guilt. For the sake of his own credit, and no
doubt of his own personal safety, he protested against any immediate
dismemberment of Spain; but he would have been contented to serve his
brother’s purpose, by nominally retaining the kingdom, till a pretext
could be found for dismembering it at a general peace.
But how long he should retain it depended upon something more than the
will and pleasure of Napoleon Buonaparte, and this he was soon made to
apprehend. ♦SIR ROWLAND HILL’S EXPEDITION TO THE BRIDGE OF ALMARAZ.♦
Lord Wellington was not about to remain idle with his victorious
army; he prepared for offensive operations, and the first step was to
interrupt the communication between the armies of Soult and Marmont.
All the permanent bridges on the Tagus below that of Arzobispo had been
destroyed; and the only way which was practicable for a large army was
by a bridge of boats at Almaraz, in the line of the high road, where
the noble bridge erected in Charles the Fifth’s time, at the city of
Plasentia’s cost, had been demolished. For the protection of this
important post, the French had thrown up strong works on both sides of
the river: they had formed a flanked _tête-du-pont_ on the left bank,
riveted with masonry and strongly intrenched; and on the high ground
above it they had constructed a large and strong redoubt, called Fort
Napoleon, with an interior intrenchment, and a loop-holed tower in its
centre; here they had mounted nine pieces of cannon, and had garrisoned
it with between 400 and 500 men. On the right bank, there was a redoubt
called Fort Ragusa, in honour of Marshal Marmont, of the same strength
and construction, except that the tower had a double tier of loopholes;
this flanked the bridge, and between the redoubt and the bridge there
was a flêche. For farther security, the invaders had fortified an old
castle commanding the Puerto de Miravete, about a league distant, being
the only pass for carriages of any kind by which the bridge could be
approached. A marked alteration of climate is perceptible upon crossing
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account