History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919 — John Shaqi
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919Reid, William
History
History of the United Co-operative Baking Society Ltd. : $b A fifty years' record 1869–1919
Reid, William
United Co-operative Baking Society, Ltd., Glasgow
The first proposition was that a manager be employed; but this was
defeated by an amendment that the management be left in the hands of the
committee. The second proposal was that the foreman baker should be the
party who should judge the quality of the flour before purchasing, the
quantity to be decided by the committee, and it was accepted, as was the
third—that no person be a member of committee who has anything to do
with the making or selling of flour to the bakery (but not to the
exclusion of operatives) so that the committee be left perfectly
untrammelled in their actions.
Another proposition was to the effect that the members of the Baking
Society’s committee should be elected for that committee only, and not
be simply delegates from the committee of their society; but as this
affected one of the rules of the Society it was not discussed. It was
also proposed that the committee should watch the purchases of societies
with a view to dealing with those who were not purchasing enough to earn
their fair share of profit, and considering whether they should be
allowed to continue as members of the Society. The committee pointed out
that they were already doing this, and the meeting agreed to the
proposal. Another proposal was to the effect that when the additional
shares had been called up the committee should purchase flour where it
could be had best. This proposal sounds as if there was some suspicion
in the minds of the proposers that the Society was being hampered in
obtaining the best flour for its purpose by lack of money, and as the
delegates gave a general acquiescence to the proposal it would seem that
the suspicion was fairly general. It certainly could be said for the
proposal that it gave the committee full power to do the best they could
for their Society.
Just before the end of the fourth year Motherwell and Dalziel societies
dropped out of the Federation at the request of the committee, as
although both societies were loyal purchasers, the cost of delivery was
so great that the Society was losing money on their trade. The
Federation still consisted of fifteen societies, however—viz.,
Anderston, Barrhead, Busby, Cathcart, Johnstone, Lennoxtown, Cadder,
Parkhead, Elderslie, Howwood, Eastern, Paisley Provident, Thornliebank,
St Rollox, and Avonbank—and other societies were being supplied with
bread. About this time, also, a new departure was made. The committee
had found that their biscuit trade was not a profitable one, and the
cashier was instructed to make inquiries as to the terms on which some
of the Glasgow biscuit manufacturing firms would supply them with
biscuits. It was finally arranged that Gray, Dunn & Co. supply them with
biscuits through the Wholesale Society, and this arrangement continued
for some time until a fire at the biscuit factory put an end to the
connection, when the trade went to Herberts Ltd.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account