History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson — John Shaqi
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The court-martial took place at Norfolk, on board the
“Chesapeake,”--his own ship, which recalled at every moment his
disgrace. The judges were his juniors, with the single exception of
Captain John Rodgers, who was president of the court. Among them sat
Stephen Decatur,--a brilliant officer, but one who had still to undergo
the experience of striking his flag and of hearing the world suspect
his surrender to be premature. Decatur held strong opinions against
Barron, and not only expressed them strongly, but also notified Barron
of them in order that he might, if he pleased, exercise the privilege
of challenging. Barron made no objection, and Decatur unwillingly kept
his place. In other respects Barron was still more hardly treated by
fortune; the first lieutenant of the “Chesapeake” had died in the
interval; Dr. Bullus, whose evidence was of the utmost importance,
could not appear; Captain Gordon turned against him, and expressed
the free opinion that Barron had never meant to resist; Captains
Murray, Hull, and Chauncey, on the court of inquiry, had already made
a hostile report; and the government prosecutor pressed every charge
with a persistency that, as coming from the Department, seemed almost
vindictive.
From January 4 to February 8 the court-martial tried charges against
Barron, after which it continued until February 22 trying Captain
Gordon, Captain Hall of the marines, and William Hook the gunner.
The result of this long, searching, and severe investigation was
remarkable, for it ended in a very elaborate decision[10] that Barron
was blameless in every particular except one. He had not been negligent
of his duty; he was not to blame for omitting to call the crew to
quarters before he received Captain Humphreys’ letter; he did well in
getting the men to quarters secretly without drum-beat; he did not
discourage his men; he had shown coolness, reflection, and personal
courage under the most trying circumstances; he was right in striking
his flag when he did,--but he was wrong in failing to prepare for
action instantly on reading Admiral Berkeley’s order; and for this
mistake he was condemned to suspension for five years from the service,
without pay or emoluments.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account