History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
“America,” it said, “is not contented with striking at the very vitals
of our commercial existence; she must also, by humbling our naval
greatness and disputing our supremacy, not only lessen us in our own
estimation, but degrade us in the eyes of Europe and of the world....
It will never be permitted to be said that the ‘Royal Sovereign’ has
struck her flag to a Yankee cockboat.”
In the whole press of England, the “Morning Chronicle” alone deprecated
an American war or blamed Berkeley’s act; and the “Morning Chronicle”
was the organ of opposition.
Monroe waited two days, and heard no more from Canning. July 29,
by a previous appointment, he went to the Foreign Office on other
business.[25] He found the Foreign Secretary still reticent, admitting
or yielding nothing, but willing to satisfy the American government
that Berkeley’s order had not been the result of instructions from
the Tory ministry. Monroe said he would send a note on the subject,
and Canning acquiesced. Monroe on the same day sent his letter, which
called attention to the outrage that had been committed and to its
unjustifiable nature, expressing at the same time full confidence that
the British government would at once disavow and punish the offending
officer. The tone of the note, though strong, was excellent, but on
one point did not quite accord with the instructions on their way from
Washington.
“I might state,” said Monroe, “other examples of great indignity and
outrage, many of which are of recent date; ... but it is improper to
mingle them with the present more serious cause of complaint.”
Monday, August 3, Canning sent a brief reply. Since Monroe’s complaint
was not founded on official knowledge, said Canning, the King’s
government was not bound to do more than to express readiness to make
reparation if such reparation should prove to be due:[26]--
“Of the existence of such a disposition on the part of the British
government you, sir, cannot be ignorant. I have already assured you
of it, though in an unofficial form, by the letter which I addressed
to you on the first receipt of the intelligence of this unfortunate
transaction; and I may perhaps be permitted to express my surprise,
after such an assurance, at the tone of that representation which I
have just had the honor to receive from you. But the earnest desire of
his Majesty to evince in the most satisfactory manner the principles
of justice and moderation by which he is uniformly actuated, has not
permitted him to hesitate in commanding me to assure you that his
Majesty neither does nor has at any time maintained the pretension of
a right to search ships of war in the national service of any State
for deserters.”
If it should prove that Berkeley’s order rested on no other ground
than the simple and unqualified pretension to such a right, the King
had no difficulty in disavowing it, and would have none in showing his
displeasure at it.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account