History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas JeffersonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 4 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of Thomas Jefferson
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The “Chesapeake,” during the difficulties at Norfolk and afterward,
lay in the Eastern Branch at Washington. The inefficiency of the
Government in doing those duties which governments had hitherto been
created to perform, was shown even more strikingly in the story of the
“Chesapeake” than in the conspiracy of Burr. The frigate “Constitution”
had sailed for the Mediterranean in August, 1803. The Government knew
that her crew were entitled to their discharge, and that the President
had no right to withhold it. The country was at peace; no emergency
of any kind existed. A single ship of about one thousand tons burden
needed to be fitted for sea at a date fixed three years beforehand; yet
when the time came and the “Constitution” ought to have reached home,
the “Chesapeake” had not so much as begun preparation. Captain James
Barron was selected to command her as commodore of the Mediterranean
squadron; Captain Charles Gordon--a native of the eastern shore of
Maryland, the youngest master-commandant on the list--was appointed
as her captain. Both were good officers and seamen; but Gordon
received his orders only February 22, and could not take command until
May 1,--long after he should have reached Gibraltar. Such was the
inefficiency of the navy-yard at Washington that although the Secretary
of the Navy had the “Chesapeake” under his eye and was most anxious to
fit her out, and although Gordon fretted incessantly, making bitter
complaints of delay, the frigate still remained in the mechanics’ hands
until the month of May. According to Commodore Barron the Washington
navy-yard was more than incompetent.[2] “I have long known,” he
claimed to have written, “the perverse disposition of the rulers of
that establishment.” Yet he urged Gordon to complete his outfit at
Washington, because the Norfolk yard was worse.[3] “I would by no means
advise your leaving the navy-yard with any unfinished work and depend
on Norfolk. You will experience more difficulty and trouble than you
can imagine.” As Burr’s trial showed that the army was honeycombed by
incompetence and conspiracy, so Barron’s court-martial proved that
nothing in naval administration could be depended upon.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account