Non-intercourse Act of March 1, 1809, its effect on commerce, i. 35, 36; English view of, 62; affected by Erskine’s arrangement, 80, 88, 90; revived by Erskine’s disavowal, 111, 114, 115; communicated to Napoleon, 135; communication denied by Napoleon, 232, 234, 235, 254; Champagny’s complaints of, 140; Napoleon’s retaliation on, 143, 150, 151, 230, 232, 254, 255; its mischievous effects in America, 164, 165, 166, 178, 184; about to expire, 183; suspended, 195–198, 210; revived by proclamation of Nov. 2, 1810, 302, 303, 304. Non-intercourse Act of May 1, 1810, its passage, i. 194–198, 274; its effect on Napoleon, 220, 244, 255; its effect in England, 273–276; its condition precedent to reviving non-intercourse, 297; creates a contract, 342, 395, 396. Non-intercourse Act of March 2, 1811, reviving act of March 1, 1809, moved by Eppes, Jan. 15, 1811, i. 338; decided upon, 347; amended, 351; reported, 352; passed, 354, 391; its effect on Napoleon, 393, 394, 400, 404; Foster’s instructions on the, ii. 23; his protest against, 39; his threat of retaliation, 44, 124; not noticed by Napoleon, 56; an intolerable burden to the United States, 140; efforts to suspend, 205, 230–234, 447; not retaliated by England, 270; forfeitures under, 438–443; Calhoun on, 444; bill for stricter enforcement of, 448. Ocaña, battle at, i. 268. Ohio, population in 1810, i. 289. Olmstead, Gideon, case of, i. 13. Ontario, Lake, armaments on, ii. 342, 344.