History of the United States of America, Volume 9 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 9 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
The British commissioners the next day, August 20, sent an official
note containing their demands, and the Americans before sending their
reply forwarded the note to America, with despatches dated August
19 and 20, announcing that they intended to return “a unanimous and
decided negative.”[22] They then undertook the task of drawing up their
reply. Upon Adams as head of the commission fell the duty of drafting
formal papers,--a duty which, without common consent, no other member
could assume. His draft met with little mercy, and the five gentlemen
sat until eleven o’clock of August 24, “sifting, erasing, patching, and
amending until we were all wearied, though none of us was yet satiated
with amendment.” At the moment when they gave final shape to the note
which they believed would render peace impossible, the army of General
Ross was setting fire to the Capitol at Washington, and President
Madison was seeking safety in the Virginia woods.
Only to persons acquainted with the difficulties of its composition did
the American note of August 24 show signs of its diverse origin.[23] In
dignified temper, with reasoning creditable to its authors and decisive
on its issues, it assured the British negotiators that any such
arrangement as they required for the Indians was contrary to precedent
in public law, was not founded on reciprocity, and was unnecessary for
its professed object in regard to the Indians. The other demands were
equally inadmissible:--
“They are founded neither on reciprocity, nor on any of
the usual bases of negotiation, neither on that of _uti
possidetis_ nor of _status ante bellum_. They are above
all dishonorable to the United States in demanding from them to
abandon territory and a portion of their citizens; to admit a
foreign interference in their domestic concerns, and to cease to
exercise their natural rights on their own shores and in their
own waters. A treaty concluded on such terms would be but an
armistice.”
The negotiators were ready to terminate the war, both parties restoring
whatever territory might have been taken, and reserving their rights
over their respective seamen; but such demands as were made by the
British government could not be admitted even for reference.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account