History of the United States of America, Volume 9 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James Madison — John Shaqi
History of the United States of America, Volume 9 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James MadisonAdams, Henry
History
History of the United States of America, Volume 9 (of 9) : $b During the second administration of James Madison
Adams, Henry
United States -- History -- 1801-1809; United States -- History -- 1809-1817
In truth the blockade was the single advantage held by England; and
even in that advantage the Americans had a share as long as their
cruisers surrounded the British Islands.
Liverpool wrote to Castlereagh, October 21,[47] commenting severely on
Prevost’s failure, and finding consolation only in the thought that the
Americans showed themselves even less patriotic than he had supposed
them to be:--
“The capture and destruction of Washington has not united the
Americans: quite the contrary. We have gained more credit
with them by saving private property than we have lost by the
destruction of their public works and buildings. Madison clings
to office, and I am strongly inclined to think that the best
thing for us is that he should remain there.”
Castlereagh at Vienna found himself unable to make the full influence
of England felt, so long as such mortifying disasters by land and sea
proved her inability to deal with an enemy she persisted in calling
contemptible.
On the American commissioners the news came, October 21, with the
effect of a reprieve from execution. Gallatin was deeply moved; Adams
could not believe the magnitude of the success; but as far as regarded
their joint action, the overthrow of England’s scheme produced no
change. Their tone had always been high, and they saw no advantage
to be gained by altering it. The British commissioners sent to them,
October 21, the substance of the new instructions, offering the
basis of _uti possidetis_, subject to modifications for mutual
convenience.[48] The Americans by common consent, October 23, declined
to treat on that basis, or on any other than the mutual restoration
of territory.[49] They thought that the British government was still
playing with them, when in truth Lord Bathurst had yielded the chief
part of the original British demand, and had come to what the whole
British empire regarded as essentials,--the right of way to Quebec, and
the exclusion of American fishermen from British shores and waters.
The American note of October 24, bluntly rejecting the basis of _uti
possidetis_, created a feeling akin to consternation in the British
Cabinet. At first, ministers assumed that the war must go on, and
deliberated only on the point to be preferred for a rupture. “We still
think it desirable to gain a little more time before the negotiation
is brought to a close,” wrote Liverpool to the Duke of Wellington,[50]
October 28; and on the same day he wrote to Castlereagh at Vienna to
warn him that the American war “will probably now be of some duration,”
and treating of its embarrassments without disguise.[51] The Czar’s
conduct at Vienna had annoyed and alarmed all the great Powers, and
the American war gave him a decisive advantage over England; but even
without the Russian complication, the prospect for ministers was not
cheering.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account