History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1 — John Shaqi
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 1
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
The French contingent to be joined at Alcantara by the Spanish
cavalry, artillery, and one-third of the infantry, and from thence
to march at once to Lisbon. Of the remaining Spanish infantry
10,000 were to take possession of the Entre Minho e Duero and
Oporto, and 6,000 were to invade Estremadura and the Algarves.
In the mean time a reserve of 40,000 men was to be assembled at
Bayonne, ready to take the field by the 20th of November, if
England should interfere, or the Portuguese people resist.
If the king of Spain or any of his family joined the troops, the
chief command was to be vested in the person so joining, but with
that exception, the French general was to be obeyed whenever the
armies of the two nations came into contact, and during the march
through Spain the French soldiers were to be fed by that country,
but paid by their own government.
The revenues of the conquered provinces were to be administered
by the general actually in possession, and for the benefit of the
nation in whose name the province was held.
Although it is evident that this treaty and convention favoured
Napoleon’s ulterior operations in Spain, by enabling him to mask
his views, and introduce large bodies of men into that country
without creating much suspicion of his real intention; it does not
follow, as some authors have asserted, that they were contrived by
the emperor for the sole purpose of rendering the Spanish royal
family odious to the world, and by this far-fetched expedient to
prevent other nations from taking an interest in their fate when he
should find it convenient to apply the same measure of injustice to
his associates that they had accorded to the family of Braganza.
[Sidenote: Voice from St. Helena, vol. ii.]
To say nothing of the weakness of such a policy, founded as it
must be on the error that governments acknowledge the dictates of
justice at the expense of their supposed interests; it must be
observed that Portugal was intrinsically a great object. History
does not speak of the time when the inhabitants of that country
were deficient in spirit; the natural obstacles to an invasion had
more than once frustrated the efforts of large armies, and the long
line of communication between Bayonne and the Portuguese frontier
could only be supported by Spanish co-operation. Add to this, the
facility with which England could, and the probability that she
would, succour her ancient ally, and the reasonable conclusion
is, that Napoleon’s first intentions were in accordance with the
literal meaning of the treaty of Fontainebleau, and that his
subsequent proceedings were the result of new projects conceived as
the wondrous imbecility of the Spanish Bourbons became manifest.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account