History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“I have received your letter in which you mention ‘_Robinson’s Life
of Picton_;’ that work I have not seen. It surprises me that any
one should doubt that Picton and Craufurd met on the day the French
army invested Almeida in 1810. I was wounded previously, and did not
therefore witness their interview; but I consider it certain that
Picton and Craufurd did meet on the 24th July, 1810, on the high
ground on the left bank of the Coa during the progress of the action,
and that a brisk altercation took place between them. They were
primed and ready for such an altercation, as angry communications had
passed between them previously regarding the disposal of some sick
of the light division. I have heard Craufurd mention in joke his and
Picton’s testiness with each other, and I considered that he alluded
both to the quarrel as to the sick; and to that which occurred when
they met during the action at Almeida.
“J. S. KENNEDY.”
“_Colonel Napier, &c. &c. &c._”
_Testimony of colonel William Campbell, who was on general
Craufurd’s staff at the action on the Coa, July 24, 1810._
“_Esplanade, Dover, 13th Nov. 1835._
“Your letter from Freshford has not been many minutes in my hands; I
hasten to reply. General Picton _did_ come out of Pinhel on the day
of the Coa combat as you term it. It was in the afternoon of that day
when all the regiments were in retreat, and general Craufurd was with
his staff and others on the heights above, that, I think, on notice
being given of general Picton’s approach, general Craufurd turned
and moved to meet him. Slight was the converse, short the interview,
for upon Craufurd’s asking enquiringly, whether general Picton did
not consider it advisable to move out something from Pinhel in
demonstration of support, or to cover the light division, in terms
not bland, the general made it understood that ‘he should do no such
thing.’ This as you may suppose put an end to the meeting, further
than some violent rejoinder on the part of my much-loved friend,
and fiery looks returned! We went our several ways, general Picton,
I think, proceeding onwards a hundred yards to take a peep at the
bridge. This is my testimony.
“Yours truly,
“WILLIAM CAMPBELL.”
“COLONEL NAPIER, &C. &C. &C.”
2º. _Battle of Busaco._—Mr. Robinson upon the authority of one of
general Picton’s letters, has endeavoured to show that my description
of this battle is a mass of errors; but it shall be proved that
his criticism is so, and that general Picton’s letter is very bad
authority.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account