History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5 — John Shaqi
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
In my work it is said that the allies resisted vigorously, yet
the French gained the summit of the ridge, and while the leading
battalions established themselves on the crowning rocks, others
wheeled to their right, intending to sweep the summit of the Sierra,
but were driven down again in a desperate charge made by the left of
the third division.
Picton’s letter says, that the head of the enemy’s column got
possession of a rocky point on the crest of the position, and that
they were followed by the remainder of a large column which was
driven down in a desperate charge made by the left of the third
division.
So far we are agreed. But Picton gives the merit of the charge to the
light companies of the seventy-fourth and eighty-eighth regiments,
and a wing of the forty-fifth aided by _the eighth Portuguese
regiment, under major Birmingham_, whereas, in the History the whole
merit is given to the eighty-eighth and forty-fifth regiments.
Lord Wellington’s despatch gives the merit to the forty-fifth, and
eighty-eighth, aided by the eighth Portuguese regiment, _under
colonel Douglas_. The “_Reminiscences of a Subaltern_,” written by an
officer of the eighty-eighth regiment, and published in the United
Service Journal, in like manner, gives the merit to the eighty-eighth
and forty-fifth British regiments, and the _eighth Portuguese_.
It will presently be seen why I took no notice of the share the
eighth Portuguese are said to have had in this brilliant achievement.
Meanwhile the reader will observe that Picton’s letter indicates
the _centre_ of his division as being forced by the French, and he
affirms that he drove them down again with his _left_ wing without
aid from the fifth division. But my statement makes both the _right_
and _centre_ of his division to be forced, and gives the fifth
division, and especially colonel Cameron and the ninth British
regiment, a very large share in the glory, moreover I say that the
_eighth Portuguese was broken to pieces_. Mr. Robinson argues that
this must be wrong, for, says he, the eighth Portuguese _were not
broken_, and if the right of the third division had been forced,
the French would have encountered the fifth division. To this he
adds, with a confidence singularly rash, his scanty knowledge of
facts considered, that colonel Cameron and the ninth regiment would
doubtless have made as good a charge as I have described, “_only they
were not there_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account