History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Now the English fleet was descried by the French off Palamos on the
evening of the 31st of July, although it did not anchor before the
1st of August; Decaen and Maurice Mathieu with some eight thousand
disposable men were then between Montserrat and Barcelona, that is
to say, only two marches from Taragona; Lamarque with from four to
five thousand, was between Palamos and Mataro, five marches from
Taragona; Quesnel with a like number was in the Cerdaña, being about
seven marches off; Suchet and Paris could have arrived in less
than eight days, and from the garrisons, and minor posts, smaller
succours might have been drawn; Tortoza alone could have furnished
two thousand. But Lacy’s division was at Vich, Sarzfield’s at Villa
Franca, Eroles’ divided between Montserrat and Urgel, Milan’s in
the Grao D’Olot, and they required five days even to assemble; when
united, they would not have exceeded seven thousand men, and with
their disputing, captious generals, would have been unfit to act
vigorously; nor could they have easily joined the allies without
fighting a battle in which their defeat would have been certain.
Sarzfield judged that ten days at least were necessary to reduce
Taragona, and positively affirmed that the army must be entirely fed
from the fleet, as the country could scarcely supply the Catalonian
troops alone. Thus Maitland would have had to land his men, his
battering train and stores, and to form his investment, in the face
of Decaen’s power, or, following the rules of war, have defeated
that general first. But Decaen’s troops numerically equal, without
reckoning the garrison of Taragona two thousand strong, were in
composition vastly superior to the allies, seeing that only three
thousand British and German troops in Maitland’s army, were to be
at all depended upon in battle; neither does it appear that the
platforms, sand-bags, fascines and other materials, necessary for a
siege, were at this period prepared and on board the vessels.
It is true Maitland would, if he had been able to resist Decaen at
first, which seems doubtful, have effected a great diversion, and
Wellington’s object would have been gained if a re-embarkation had
been secure; but the naval officers, having reference to the nature
of the coast, declared that a safe re-embarkation could not be
depended upon. The soundness of this opinion has indeed been disputed
by many seamen, well acquainted with the coast, who maintain, that
even in winter the Catalonian shore is remarkably safe and tranquil;
and that Cape Salou, a place in other respects admirably adapted for
a camp, affords a certain retreat, and facility of re-embarking on
one or other of its sides in all weather. However, to Maitland the
coast of Catalonia was represented as unsafe, and this view of the
question is also supported by very able seamen likewise acquainted
with that sea.
OPERATIONS IN MURCIA.
[Sidenote: July.]
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account