History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Again the junta pretended that they desired the deliverance of
Portugal to enable them to unite with the southern provinces in
a general effort; but Mr. Stuart’s letters prove that they would
never unite at all with any other province, and that their aim was
to separate from Spain altogether and join Portugal. Their wish to
avoid personal inconvenience was notorious, it was the cause of
their refusal to let sir David Baird’s troops disembark, it was
apparent to all who had to deal with them, and it belongs to the
national character. Then their eagerness to obtain money, and their
unpatriotic use of it when obtained, has been so amply set forth in
various parts of my history that I need not do more than refer to
that, and to my quoted authorities, especially in the second chapters
of the 3d and 14th Books. Moreover the reviewer’s quotations belie
his comments, and like the slow-worm defined by Johnson “a blind
worm, a large viper, _venomous_, _not mortal_,” he is at once dull
and malignant.
The junta told sir Arthur Wellesley that ten thousand Portuguese
troops were at Oporto, and that two thousand Spaniards, who had
marched the 15th, would be there on the 25th of July; yet when sir
Arthur arrived at Oporto, on the 25th, he found only fifteen hundred
Portuguese and three hundred Spaniards; the two thousand men said to
be in march had never moved and were not expected. Here then instead
of twelve thousand men, there were only eighteen hundred! At Coimbra
indeed eighty miles from Oporto, there were five thousand militia and
regulars, one-third of which were unarmed, and according to colonel
Browne’s letter, as given in the folio edition of the inquiry upon
the Cintra convention, there were also twelve hundred armed peasants
which the reviewer has magnified into twelve thousand. Thus without
dwelling on the difference of place, the difference between the true
numbers and the statements of the Gallician junta, was four thousand;
nor will it mend the matter if we admit the armed peasants to be
twelve thousand, for that would make a greater difference on the
other side.
The junta estimated the French at fifteen thousand men, but the
embarkation returns of the number shipped after the convention gave
twenty-five thousand seven hundred and sixty, making a difference of
more than ten thousand men, exclusive of those who had fallen or been
captured in the battles of Vimiero and Roliça, and of those who had
died in hospital! Have I not a right to treat these as inaccurate
statements; and the reviewer’s remark as an impertinence?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account