History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“I arrived here yesterday, when _contrary to his promise_ and to my
expectations I find the marquis de la Romana with a great part of his
troops.”—“He said to me in direct terms that had he known how things
were, he neither would have accepted the command nor have returned
to Spain. With all this, however, he talks of attacks and movements
which are _quite absurd_, and then returns to the helpless state
of his army.” “_He could not be persuaded to destroy the bridge at
Mansillas_, he posted some troops at it which were forced and taken
prisoners by the French on their march from Mayorga.”
The reviewer must now be content to swallow his disgust at finding
Napoleon’s genius admired, Soult’s authority accepted, and Romana’s
military talents contemned in my History; these proofs of my accuracy
are more than enough, and instead of adding to them, an apology
is necessary for having taken so much notice of two articles only
remarkable for malevolent imbecility and systematic violation of
truth. But if the reader wishes to have a good standard of value,
let him throw away this silly fellow’s carpings, and look at the
duke of Wellington’s despatches as compiled by colonel Gurwood, 5th
and 6th volumes. He will there find that my opinions are generally
corroborated, never invalidated by the duke’s letters, and that while
no fact of consequence is left out by me, new light has been thrown
upon many events, the true bearings of which were unknown at the time
to the English general. Thus at page 337 of the despatches, lord
Wellington speaks in doubt about some obscure negociations of marshal
Victor, which I have shewn, book vii. chap. iii. to be a secret
intrigue for the treacherous surrender of Badajos. The proceedings
in Joseph’s council of war, related by me, and I am the first writer
who was ever informed of them, shew the real causes of the various
attacks made by the French at the battle of Talavera. I have shewn
also, and I am the first English writer who has shewn it, that the
French had in Spain one hundred thousand more men than the English
general knew of, that Soult brought down to the valley of the Tagus
after the fight of Talavera, a force which was stronger by more than
twenty thousand men than sir Arthur Wellesley estimated it to be;
and without this knowledge the imminence of the danger, which the
English army escaped by crossing the bridge of Arzobispo, cannot be
understood.
[Sidenote: See Wellington’s Despatches, vol. v. p. 488, et passim.]
Again, the means of correcting the error which Wellington fell into
in 1810 relative to Soult, who he supposed to have been at the head
of the second corps in Placentia when he was really at Seville, has
been furnished by me, insomuch as I have shewn that it was Mermet who
was at the head of that corps, and that Wellington was deceived by
the name of the younger Soult who commanded Mermet’s cavalry.
Two facts only have been misstated in my history.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account