History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5 — John Shaqi
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
“Lieut.-colonel Warre was the senior officer present at the
surrender, having joined lord Fitzroy Somerset (who was in search
of the governor and the missing part of the garrison) just as he
was collecting a few men wherewith to summon in his capacity of
aide-de-camp to the commander-in-chief, the tête-du-pont of San
Christoval.”
2º. _Assault of Tarifa._ “The Spaniards and the forty-seventh British
regiment guarded the breach.”
_Correction by sir Hugh Gough._
“The only part of the forty-seventh engaged during _the assault_ were
two companies under captain Livelesly, stationed on the east bastion
one hundred and fifty paces from the breach, and the Spaniards
were no where to be seen, except behind a pallisade in the street,
a considerable way from the breach. _The eighty-seventh, and the
eighty-seventh alone, defended the breach._ The two companies of
the forty-seventh, I before mentioned, and the two companies of
the rifles, which latter were stationed on my left but all under
my orders, did all that disciplined and brave troops could do in
support, and the two six-pounders, under lieut.-colonel Mitchel of
the artillery, most effectively did their duty while their fire could
tell, the immediate front of the breach from the great dip of the
ground not being under their range.”
This correction renders it proper that I should give my authority for
saying the Spaniards were at the breach.
Extract from a letter of sir Charles Smith, the engineer who defended
Tarifa, to colonel Napier.
“The next great measure of opposition was to assign to the Spaniards
the defence of the breach. This would have been insupportable: the
able advocacy of lord Proby proved that it would be a positive insult
to the Spanish nation to deprive its troops of the honour, and all
my solemn remonstrances could produce, was to split the difference,
and take upon myself to determine which half of the breach should be
entrusted to our ally.”
The discrepancy between sir Charles Smith’s and sir Hugh Gough’s
statement is however easily reconciled, being more apparent than
real. The Spaniards were _ordered_ to defend half the breach, but in
_fact_ did not appear there.
To the above it is proper here to add a fact made known to me since
my fourth volume was published, and very honourable to major Henry
King, of the eighty-second regiment. Being commandant of the town
of Tarifa, a command distinct from the island, he was called to
a council of war on the 29th of December, and when most of those
present were for abandoning the place he gave in the following note,
“I am decidedly of opinion that the defence of Tarifa will afford the
British garrison an opportunity of gaining eternal honour, and it
ought to be defended to the last extremity.
“I. H. S. KING,
“_Commandant of Tarifa_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account