History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5 — John Shaqi
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5Napier, William Francis Patrick
History
History of the war in the Peninsula and in the south of France from the year 1807 to the year 1814, vol. 5
Napier, William Francis Patrick
Peninsular War, 1807-1814
Mr. Perceval objects to my quoting lord Wellesley’s manifesto,
because that nobleman expressed sorrow at its appearance, and denied
that he had composed it. But the very passage of lord Wellesley’s
speech on which Mr. Perceval relies, proves, that the sentiments and
opinions of the manifesto were really entertained by lord Wellesley,
who repudiates the style only, and regrets, not that the statement
appeared, but that it should have appeared at the moment when Mr.
Perceval had been killed. The expression of this very natural feeling
he, however, took care to guard from any mistake, by reasserting his
contempt for Mr. Perceval’s political character. Thus he identified
his opinions with those contained in the manifesto. And this view of
the matter is confirmed by those extracts which I have given from the
correspondence of Mr. Sydenham, no mean authority, for he was a man
of high honour and great capacity; and he was the confidential agent
employed by lord Wellesley, to ascertain and report upon the feelings
and views of lord Wellington, with respect to the war; and also upon
those obstacles to his success, which were daily arising, either from
the conduct of the ministers at home, or from the intrigues of their
diplomatists abroad.
[Sidenote: See Extract. No. 15]
[Sidenote: Do. No. 7.]
[Sidenote: Do. No. 10.]
[Sidenote: Do. No. 17.]
Thus it appears that if lord Wellington’s complaints, as exhibited
in these extracts, were unfounded, they were at least so plausible
as to mislead Mr. Sydenham on the spot, and lord Wellesley at a
distance, and I may well be excused if they also deceived me. But
was I deceived? Am I to be condemned as an historian, because lord
Wellington, in the evening of his life, and in the ease and fulness
of his glory, generously forgets the crosses, and remembers only
the benefits of by-gone years? It may be said indeed, that his
difficulties were real, and yet the government not to blame, seeing
that it could not relieve them. To this I can oppose the ordering
away of the transports, on which, in case of failure, the safety
of the army depended! To this I can oppose the discrepancy between
the public and private instructions of the ministers! To this I can
oppose those most bitter passages, “_If any thing fails I shall not
be forgiven_,” and “_I have no reason to believe that I shall be
supported in England_.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account