History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
History
History of the Water Supply of the World: arranged in a comprehensive form from eminent authorities, containing a description of the various methods of water supply, pollution and purification of waters, and sanitary effects, with analyses of potable waters, also geology and water strata of Hamilton county, Ohio, statistics of the Ohio river, proposed water supply of Cincinnati.
Bell, Thomas J. (Thomas Jefferson)
Water-supply -- History; Water-supply -- Ohio -- Hamilton County
------------------------+----+----+----+------+----+-----+
|JAN.|FEB.|MAR.|APRIL.|MAY.|JUNE.|
+----+----+----+------+----+-----+
Gain by rain--inches |2.00|2.21|2.40| 2.93 |3.47|2.88 |
Loss by evaporation--in.| .60| .70|1.00| 1.60 |2.90|3.40 |
+----+----+----+------+----+-----+
Difference--Gain inches |1.40|1.51|1.40| 1.33 | .57| -- |
Difference--Loss inches | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- | .52 |
========================+====+====+====+======+====+=====+
------------------------+-----+----+-----+----+----+----+------
|JULY.|AUG.|SEPT.|OCT.|NOV.|DEC.|TOTAL.
+-----+----+-----+----+----+----+------
Gain by rain--inches |2.99 |3.00|2.67 |2.53|2.48|2.24| 32.
Loss by evaporation--in.|3.70 |4.00|2.90 |1.50|1.00| .70| 24.
+-----+----+-----+----+----+----+------
Difference--Gain inches | -- | -- | -- |1.03|1.48|1.54| 8.
Difference--Loss inches | .71 | .80| .23 | -- | -- | -- | --
========================+=====+====+=====+====+====+====+======
SUMMARY OF FLOW OF RAIN-FALL IN CU. FT. PER MINUTE PER SQUARE
MILE.--(_From Fanning._)
AT LAKE AT CROTON
COCHITUATE BASIN
CU. FEET. CU FEET.
January, 99.17 92.48
February, 150.42 147.69
March, 174.76 177.02
April, 169.80 132.63
May, 131.80 164.49
June, 44.27 115.12
July, 45.27 48.37
August, 49.15 70.22
September, 42.84 85.99
October, 62.45 81.08
November, 75.90 124.92
December, 78.94 106.23
AQUEDUCTS.
The plan, as adopted by Mr. Hawskley at Liverpool, and Mr. Bateman
at Glasgow, of subterranean pipes, is now universally followed by
engineers. And there is no longer any excuse for incurring the outlay
which must attend the erection of monumental structures, such as were
necessary in the times of the ancient Romans.
The engineer of Marseilles Conduit adopted the “Pont du Gard” plan
for conducting the waters of the Durance, in preference to iron
pipes, and constructed the splendid folly, “as Humber terms it,” of
the aqueduct “Roquefavour.” The dimensions are:
Length, 1,289 feet.
Height, 266 feet.
1st tier of 12 arches each 49½ feet span.
2d tier of 15 arches each 52½ feet span.
Upper tier of 54 arches each 16½ feet span.
The cost was $750,000, while inverted syphon pipes could have been
laid for one-third of this sum.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account