History of the Zulu war and its originColenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
History
History of the Zulu war and its origin
Colenso, Frances E. (Frances Ellen)
Zulu War, 1879
Nevertheless, after careful consideration, and on thoroughly sifting
the obtainable evidence, the Bishop could not avoid coming to the
painful conclusion that the story was substantially true, and was a
valid excuse for Langalibalele’s fear. Finding that further appeal
on behalf of the prisoner to those on the spot was in vain, he now
wrote and printed a pamphlet (giving the usual native version that
the first shot fired was _at_ Matshana) on the subject for private
circulation, and especially for Lord Carnarvon’s information.[28]
One of the first results of the appearance of this pamphlet was
a demand on the part of Mr. J. Shepstone’s solicitor for “an
immediate, full, and unqualified retraction of the libel falsely and
maliciously published in the pamphlet, with a claim for £1000 damages
for the injury done to Mr. J. Shepstone by the same.”
Such an action would have had but a small chance of a decision upon
the Bishop’s side at that time in Natal, so, to defend himself—and
not, as generally supposed, out of enmity to the Shepstones—he
appealed to Lord Carnarvon in the matter, on the grounds that his
action had been taken for the public good, and in the interests of
justice.
Meanwhile the unfortunate chief and his eldest son Malambule
were sent to Robben Island, the former as a prisoner for life,
the latter for five years. They were secretly conveyed away from
Pietermaritzburg to the port, and every effort made to prevent the
Bishop from seeing them, or interfering on their behalf. Other sons,
two of them mere lads, who had as yet held no more important position
in the tribe than that of herdboys to their father’s cattle, and many
of the headmen and indunas, were condemned to imprisonment in the
gaol at Pietermaritzburg for terms varying in length from six months
to seven years. The two young sons, lads named Mazwi and Siyepu, were
kept prisoners for the shortest period named, six months; but it was
some little time after they left the gaol before they were really
set at liberty. The family at Bishopstowe, where their mothers and
many of their other relatives were located, were naturally anxious to
have the two boys also, and, as soon as their term of imprisonment
was up, applied for the charge of them. Somewhat to their surprise
all sorts of difficulties were raised on the point—one would have
thought a very simple one—and they were at last curtly informed
that the boys did not wish to go to Bishopstowe, and would remain
where they were, under surveillance in another district. The Bishop
himself was away at the time, but his eldest daughter, acting for
him, soon discovered through native sources that in point of fact the
boys were extremely anxious to go to Bishopstowe, but were in too
terrified a condition to express a wish. The question had been put to
them in this form: “So! you have been complaining! you say you want
to leave the place you have been sent to, and go to Bishopstowe?”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account