Household words, No. 17, July 20, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 17, July 20, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
I go to all the Modern Exhibitions every season, and of course I revere
the Royal Academy. I stand by its forty Academical articles almost as
firmly as I stand by the thirty-nine Articles of the Church of England.
I am convinced that in neither case could there be, by any rightful
possibility, one article more or less.
It is now exactly three years—three years ago, this very month—since I
went from Westminster to the Temple, one Thursday afternoon, in a cheap
steam-boat. The sky was black, when I imprudently walked on board. It
began to thunder and lighten immediately afterwards, and the rain poured
down in torrents. The deck seeming to smoke with the wet, I went below;
but so many passengers were there, smoking too, that I came up again,
and buttoning my pea-coat, and standing in the shadow of the paddle-box,
stood as upright as I could, and made the best of it.
It was at this moment that I first beheld the terrible Being, who is the
subject of my present recollections.
Standing against the funnel, apparently with the intention of drying
himself by the heat as fast as he got wet, was a shabby man in
threadbare black, and with his hands in his pockets, who fascinated me
from the memorable instant when I caught his eye.
Where had I caught that eye before? Who was he? Why did I connect him,
all at once, with the Vicar of Wakefield, Alfred the Great, Gil Blas,
Charles the Second, Joseph and his Brethren, the Fairy Queen, Tom Jones,
the Decameron of Boccaccio, Tam O’Shanter, the Marriage of the Doge of
Venice with the Adriatic, and the Great Plague of London? Why, when he
bent one leg, and placed one hand upon the back of the seat near him,
did my mind associate him wildly with the words, “Number one hundred and
forty-two, Portrait of a gentleman?” Could it be that I was going mad?
I looked at him again, and now I could have taken my affidavit that he
belonged to the Vicar of Wakefield’s family. Whether he was the Vicar,
or Moses, or Mr. Burchill, or the Squire, or a conglomeration of all
four, I knew not; but I was impelled to seize him by the throat, and
charge him with being, in some fell way, connected with the Primrose
blood. He looked up at the rain, and then—oh Heaven!—he became Saint
John. He folded his arms, resigning himself to the weather, and I was
frantically inclined to address him as the Spectator, and firmly demand
to know what he had done with Sir Roger de Coverley.
The frightful suspicion that I was becoming deranged, returned upon me
with redoubled force. Meantime, this awful stranger, inexplicably linked
to my distress, stood drying himself at the funnel; and ever, as the
steam rose from his clothes, diffusing a mist around him, I saw through
the ghostly medium all the people I have mentioned, and a score more,
sacred and profane.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account