Household words, No. 26, September 21, 1850 : $b A weekly journal — John Shaqi
Household words, No. 26, September 21, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
General
Household words, No. 26, September 21, 1850 : $b A weekly journal
English literature -- Periodicals
So, in Brussels, where the English almost outnumber the native
population, the audiences relish a curious amount of ignorance
respecting England and the English; as the dramatis personæ of a piece
exhibited so recently as last May at the Théâtre St Hubert, will
show. It was called “_La Lectrice, ou une folie de jeune homme.
Comédie Vaudeville en 2 actes_, par M. Bazard.” It must have had
a considerable run; for the play-bill states that M. Ferville had
created a great sensation in the character of “Sir Cobridge,” at
Paris. We have some idea that “Sir Cobridge” must be intended for
the Sleeping Partner in a Porter-Brewery, and that the name is a
dreamy reminiscence of the popular individual Sir Co, made easy of
remembrance by sign-boards. But the first personage we have occasion
to mention is, “Sir Arthur” (jeune officier), who has no other name,
and who has no occasion for one, everybody calling him “my lord,”
according (as he observed) to the usual form of address in England.
Sir Arthur considers it the first duty of a British officer to insult
a respectable blind old gentleman--who is moreover his guest--because
the blind old gentleman ventures to insinuate something against one of
the officers of Sir Arthur’s regiment, through whom he has suffered
severely. This chivalrous young nobleman, disdaining all inquiry into
the circumstances, at once constitutes himself champion of every
individual belonging to the entire British army. The next personage is
a young gentleman possessing (as _he_ observed) a name extremely
common in Britain, to wit, “Clac-Own.” The actor of this part was
fitted up with a wig of violently red hair, like a carriage-rug, and
was dressed in a kind of fusion of an English jockey with a French
Field-Marshal. Expecting to inherit the vast possession of his uncle,
Sir Cobridge, Clac-Own passed his time, according to the custom of
Anglican nephews in such cases, in giving his uncle to understand how
extremely inconvenient he finds his society, and in informing him
that “Shak-es-pair”--who, being Sir Cobridge’s favourite author, is
naturally the avowed bugbear of Clac-Own,--is an insufferable bore.
This is going too far; and the wealthy old gentleman (who has quietly
submitted to every other species of personal insult from his intended
heir,) is so shocked by this contempt for “Shak-es-pair,” that he
feels himself compelled to sing a song; wherein he demonstrates, in
the most lucid tira-lal-a-la logic, that Clac-Own is very decidedly in
the wrong. The scena concludes by Sir Cobridge ordering Clac-Own off,
in some very deep bass notes, to “Le Lincoln!”--an idiomatic place
of banishment, that would appear to be very popular among us, though
whether it stands for Coventry, Bath, Jericho, Halifax, or any other
such place, we are unable to report. Clac-Own, Sir Arthur, and several
others having assembled at a later stage of the proceedings to go out
hunting, the Belgian public perceive that our usual equipment for that
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account