How much Bolshevism is there in America? : $b Also a series of articles entitled "Russia from the inside" — John Shaqi
How much Bolshevism is there in America? : $b Also a series of articles entitled "Russia from the inside"Dosch-Fleurot, Arno
History
How much Bolshevism is there in America? : $b Also a series of articles entitled "Russia from the inside"
Dosch-Fleurot, Arno
Communism -- Soviet Union; Communism -- United States; Labor -- United States; Working class -- United States
After visiting the steel towns and the modern factory cities I agree
with the I. W. W. that American industry is not organized. Labor, as
distinguished from industry, is organized, but the factories, with their
hundreds of thousands—added together, their millions—of unskilled and
semi-skilled labor, are quite unorganized. The A. F. of L. has not
interested itself in them, and the I. W. W. has tried to do it on so
pretentiously revolutionary a scale that it has not succeeded. The field
is open. The American field of industry is practically unhampered by the
prejudices or the hard conditions of Europe. The European-trained
agitators have sown the American industrial field time and again with
their European-born ideas, but they have not yielded a crop.
There are, broadly, two kinds of employers in American industry. There
is the “catch ’em young, treat ’em rough and learn ’em nothing” kind
which is loud in support of “property rights” and is backing the
ruthless open-shop “American plan.” The steel, coal and copper
industries, the heavy industries, are dominated by this spirit even at
this late date. To them labor has no rights. It is enough to make a
Bolshevik out of any workman who comes in contact with them. Take Butte,
where the Anaconda Copper Company rules. If a miner comes to Butte he
must go through the copper company’s passport bureau before he can even
apply for a job. If he succeeds in getting a “rustling card,” a sort of
passport bearing a description of him, he can seek work at the mines. If
he is a member of a union that is not in favor, he has to lie about it
and say he is not or he does not get a “rustling card.” This is
industrial feudalism, and there is no calling it by another name. I was
in the office of the Bulletin, the labor paper published in Butte, and I
noticed half a dozen rifles in the corner of the plant. “Have you got a
Red Guard?” I asked. “No, but the company has a White Guard,” was the
answer; “we have to protect ourselves, especially around election.”
Efforts to Solve Problem.
Combating this spirit there is a type of American employer who realizes
he has a responsibility toward the men he gathers together in his
factories. He comes nearer representing the modern spirit in American
industry. He usually begins with some patronizing welfare work, but ends
up with whole-hearted co-operation. Men of this type see the gulf
between capital and labor, and instead of trying to widen it and
perpetuate industrial strife like the leaders in the heavy industries
they are throwing out flying bridges across the gulf. They are trying to
establish a decent human relationship between employer and employee and
give the lie to the I. W. W. preamble that “the working class and the
employing class have nothing in common.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account