The first of these facts is that Science admits the existence of
living individual personalities. When a man is made a Fellow of the
Royal Society, or when a President of the British Association for the
Advancement of Science is elected, the choice falls upon more than a
mere bulk of matter combined with a certain amount of force and energy.
Added to these there is a something characterised by knowledge, memory,
consciousness, will, conscience, morality, a perception of good and
evil, a capability of love and hatred, and all the other qualities
that go to the making up of what people mean when they speak of a
“soul.” If “non-survivalists” prefer to use some other word, well and
good. Disputes about names are a mere beating of the air. What is of
moment is that all parties are agreed as to the real existence of the
something to which reference has here been made.
The second fact is that Science admits the “soul” and body of a human
being to be distinct and separate entities, even though they may
be closely associated. This is not so clearly obvious as the first
fact; and some--though not many--scientists may feel disposed to
challenge the accuracy of the assertion. It is necessary, therefore, to
substantiate it in a detailed fashion.
It is a matter of common knowledge that if a man’s body be deprived of
an arm, a leg, an eye, etc., the “soul” is not affected thereby in any
essential way. Our hair may be shaved off, our nails cut, our teeth
extracted, and our “souls” are none the worse for the operations. A
lung may be put out of action by tuberculosis and the “soul” lives on
unaffected. A human being may be “apparently drowned” or may become
entranced. His breathing may cease, his very heart may stop beating.
The ordinary bodily mechanism by means of which the “soul” makes its
presence known may cease to be operative, and--as actually happens
now and again--the individual may be so “dead” in the judgment of
physicians that he or she is laid out for burial, aye, and is sometimes
buried in real earnest, while all the time the soul is as full of life
as ever it was. Every person of education is aware that these are
matters of frequent observation and experience. They cannot be denied.
They are not consistent with the idea of the existence of the “soul”
being limited by the existence of the body.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account