Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
If a person of energetic and fine-strung temperament is neither vain nor
proud, and lives equably without suffering seriously from mortification,
jealousy, and the like; it is because he has in some way learned to
discipline and control his self-feeling, and thus to escape the pains to
which it makes him liable. To effect some such escape has always been a
present and urgent problem with sensitive minds, and the literature of
the inner life is very largely a record of struggle with the inordinate
passions of the social self. To the commoner and somewhat sluggish sorts
of people these passions are, on the whole, agreeable and beneficent.
Emulation, ambition, honor, even pride and vanity in moderation, belong
to the higher and more imaginative parts of our thought; they awaken us
from sensuality and inspire us with ideal and socially determined
purposes. The doctrine that they are evil could have originated only
with those who felt them so; that is, I take it, with unusually
sensitive spirits, or those whom circumstances denied a normal and
wholesome self-expression. To such the thought of self becomes painful,
not because of any lack of self-feeling; but, quite the reverse,
because, being too sensitive and tender, it becomes overwrought, so that
this thought sets in vibration an emotional chord already strained and
in need of rest. To such minds self-abnegation becomes an ideal, an
ideal of rest, peace and freedom, like green pastures and still waters.
The prophets of the inner life, like Marcus Aurelius, St. Paul, St.
Augustine, Thomas à Kempis, and Pascal, were men distinguished not by
the lack of an aggressive self, but by a success in controlling and
elevating it which makes them the examples of all who undergo a like
struggle with it. If their ego had not been naturally importunate they
would not have been forced to contend with it, and to develop the
tactics of that contention for the edification of times to come.
The social self may be protected either in the negative way, by some
sort of withdrawal from the suggestions that agitate and harass it, or
in the positive way, by contending with them and learning to control and
transform them, so that they are no longer painful; most teachers
inculcating some sort of a combination of these two kinds of tactics.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account