Human nature and the social orderCooley, Charles Horton
Science
Human nature and the social order
Cooley, Charles Horton
Individualism; Social psychology; Sociology
It is often asserted or assumed that hostile feeling is in its very
nature obnoxious and painful to the human mind, and persists in spite of
us, as it were, because it is forced upon us by the competitive
conditions of existence. This view seems to me hardly sound. I should
rather say that the mental and social harmfulness of anger, in common
experience, is due not so much to its peculiar character as hostile
feeling, as to the fact that, like lust, it is so surcharged with
instinctive energy as to be difficult to control and limit to its proper
function; while, if not properly disciplined, it of course introduces
disorder and pain into the mental life.
To a person in robust condition, with plenty of energy to spare, a
thorough-going anger, far from being painful, is an expansive, I might
say glorious, experience, _while the fit is on and has full control_. A
man in a rage does not want to get out of it, but has a full sense of
life which he impulsively seeks to continue by repelling suggestions
tending to calm him. It is only when it has begun to pall upon him that
he is really willing to be appeased. This may be seen by observing the
behavior of impulsive children, and also of adults whose passions are
undisciplined.
An enduring hatred may also be a source of satisfaction to some minds,
though this I believe to be unusual in these days, and becoming more so.
One who reads Hazlitt’s powerful and sincere, though perhaps unhealthy,
essay on the Pleasure of Hating, will see that the thing is possible. In
most cases remorse and distress set in so soon as the fit of anger
begins to abate, and its destructive incompatibility with the
established order and harmony of the mind begins to be felt. There is a
conviction of sin, the pain of a shattered ideal, just as there is after
yielding to any other unchastened passion. The cause of the pain seems
to be not so much the peculiar character of the feeling as its
exorbitant intensity.
Any simple and violent passion is likely to be felt as painful and wrong
in its after-effects because it destroys that harmony or synthesis that
reason and conscience strive to produce; and this effect is probably
more and more felt as the race advances and mental life becomes more
complex. The conditions of civilization require of us so extensive and
continuous an expenditure of psychical force, that we no longer have the
superabundance of emotional energy that makes a violent outlet
agreeable. Habits and principles of self-control naturally arise along
with the increasing need for economy and rational guidance of emotion;
and whatever breaks through them causes exhaustion and remorse. Any
gross passion comes to be felt as “the expense of spirit in a waste of
shame.” Spasms of violent feeling properly belong with a somewhat
apathetic habit of life, whose accumulating energies they help to
dissipate, and are as much out of place to-day as the hard-drinking
habits of our Saxon ancestors.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account