Humphry Davy, Poet and PhilosopherThorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Science
Humphry Davy, Poet and Philosopher
Thorpe, T. E. (Thomas Edward)
Davy, Humphry, Sir, 1778-1829
In matters of chemical nomenclature Davy was a great latitudinarian.
All that he contended for was that names should be independent of all
speculative views, and should rather be derived from some simple and
invariable property. It is remarkable, however, that he who invented
the happy term “chlorine” should have objected to the word “cyanogen.”
At the close of the short paper “On the Prussic Basis and Acid,” in
which he first made known the existence of the cyanides of phosphorus
and of iodine, he said:--
“I wish M. Gay Lussac could be prevailed upon to give up the
inexpressive and difficult names of cyanogen and hydrocyanic
acid, and to adopt the simple ones of prussic gas and prussic
acid.”
By treating the potassium hyper-oxymuriate of Berthollet (potassium
chlorate) with hydrochloric acid, a greenish-yellow explosive gas is
obtained which Chenevix had referred to as “hyper-oxygenised muriatic
acid,” and as indicating the existence of a compound of oxymuriatic gas
and oxygen in a separate state. Davy, as we have seen, was at first
inclined to doubt the existence of this substance, and to consider the
gas as simply chlorine. But on comparing it with chlorine prepared in
other ways he perceived a difference; its solution in water was of
lemon yellow or orange colour; when treated with mercury it becomes of
a brilliant yellow green. It is, moreover, highly explosive, especially
when heated, even at the warmth of the hand, when it loses its vivid
colour, and is resolved into a mixture of oxygen and chlorine. Metals,
arsenic, phosphorus, charcoal, nitric oxide, act upon it in a manner
different from that of chlorine. Davy makes use of these differences as
a proof of the correctness of his views of the nature of chlorine.
“If the power of bodies to burn in oxymuriatic gas depended upon
the presence of oxygen, they all ought to burn with much more
energy in the new compound; but copper and antimony, and mercury
and arsenic and iron and sulphur have no action upon it, till
it is decomposed; and they act then according to their relative
attractions on the oxygen, or on the oxymuriatic gas. There is a
simple experiment which illustrates this idea. Let a glass vessel
containing brass foil be exhausted, and the new gas admitted, no
action will take place; throw in a little nitrous gas [nitric
oxide], a rapid decomposition occurs, and the metal burns with
great brilliancy.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account