Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical surveyReich, Emil
History
Hungarian literature : $b An historical & critical survey
Reich, Emil
Hungarian literature -- History and criticism
1711-1772. The period bounded by the years 1711-1772 is one of decline.
During these years, which comprise the reigns of Emperor Charles VI.,
and most of that of Austria’s greatest ruler, Maria Theresa (1740-1780),
there was practically very little Magyar literature; and the little
was bad. Hungarians of that period wrote, as a rule, in Latin; and the
subjects they selected were those of laborious erudition; philology;
descriptive natural science; annalistic history; historic theology. This
decline in national literature was only another phase of the decline
of the Magyar idiom. For, both in Transylvania, which was now again,
as formerly, united with Hungary, and in Hungary proper, the Hungarian
language ceased to be used in the schools, at the county-sessions,
in the law-courts, and in polite society. In all these centres of
intellectual intercourse, Latin, German or French were used instead
of the sonorous language of Árpád. In Catholic and Protestant schools
alike instruction was given in bad Latin. At the county-sessions; in
the national parliament; and in the law-courts, Latin alone was used;
while the higher classes of society were talking either in German or in
French. For the latter fact, there is a simple explanation at hand. When,
in 1711, Hungary was at last “pacified,” it had become evident to the
most patriotic of the leading families, that further armed resistance
to the Habsburgs being impossible, the only chances of promotion for
their children were at the court of Vienna. This involved the adoption
of Viennese manners, and Viennese mediums of conversation; that is,
of French and German. No sooner was that done by the aristocratic
families of Hungary, than the abnormal state of the then national
literature revealed all its latent barrenness. As has been seen in the
preceding chapters, all the great Hungarian writers from 1600 to 1711
were recruited from the class of the magnates. When, now, after 1711,
the magnates flocked to Vienna, there to undergo a thorough process of
Germanization, or rather Austrianization, there was no class of writers
left in Hungary to take their place. Hence the sudden dearth of great
writers, and the astounding decline of Hungarian Literature. To this
must be added the fact, that German literature which was naturally
destined to have a considerable influence on Hungarian writers, both
from geographical contiguity, and on account of the general knowledge
of German in the then Hungary; that German literature, we say, was not
beginning to reach its classical period before the sixties of that
century, and could therefore stimulate Hungarian Literature but very
little. It is much more difficult to account for the exclusive use
of Latin in the schools and in parliamentary debates. Had the use of
Latin in the schools been accompanied by the study of Greek and Greek
literature it would probably have wrought very much less mischief.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account