Hygiene: a manual of personal and public health (New Edition)Newsholme, Arthur, Sir
Science
Hygiene: a manual of personal and public health (New Edition)
Newsholme, Arthur, Sir
Hygiene; Public health -- Great Britain; Sanitation
Good meat, whether beef or mutton, ought to have a marbled appearance,
a medium colour, neither pale pink nor deep purple; its texture should
be firm, and not leave the impress of the finger; its odour slight and
pleasant, the juice reddish and acid, the bundles of fibres not coarse,
and free from foreign particles imbedded in them; and lastly, it should
not be taken from an animal killed near the time of parturition, nor in
consequence of any accident or disease.
=Beef= is, as a rule, more lean than mutton or pork; it has a closer
texture, and more nutritive material in a given bulk. It is also
fullest of the red-blood juices, and possesses a richer flavour than
the two others.
Liebig’s beef extract contains little if any albumin or gelatin. It
is a useful stimulant to the gastric secretion, as in soups at the
beginning of a meal, but is not a food. Its chief constituents are the
various extractives of meat, the most important of which are inosinic
acid, kreatin (C₄H₉N₃O₂,H₂O), and inosite, or muscle sugar (C₆H_{12}O₆,
2H₂O). Even in substances like Bovril, containing powdered meat fibre
mixed with Liebig’s extract, the amount of nutritive material is very
small. The white of one egg contains as much nutritive matter as three
teaspoonsful of bovril. None of these substances can be trusted like
eggs or milk to keep a patient alive for several weeks.
=Mutton= is regarded as being more suitable for people of sedentary
occupation than beef. =Lamb= is more watery than mutton, and less
nutritious.
=Veal=, as ordinarily prepared in this country, is difficult of
digestion; its shreddy, juiceless fibres eluding the teeth, and
consequently not undergoing proper mastication.
=Pork= is not so digestible as beef or mutton, partly because of the
large proportion of fat, and partly because its fibres are hard and
difficult to masticate. Its digestibility varies greatly with its age,
breeding, and proportion of fat.
The =Flesh of Birds= contains very little fat, and that found separate
from the meat is rarely nice. Most birds are edible, but fish-eating
birds are apt to be nasty. As a rule, the flavour of the male bird is
richer than that of the female. The chief virtues in poultry are their
tenderness, and the large proportion of phosphates they contain. They
are deficient in fat and in iron. To compensate for the former, one
commonly takes with them melted butter and fat bacon or pork sausages;
to compensate for the latter, the addition of Liebig’s extract to the
gravy is useful. Young, and consequently tender, birds are known by
their large feet and leg-joints. When a bird appears at table with
violet-tinged thighs and a thin neck, if possible avoid being helped to
the leg. Wild fowls are harder and less digestible than tame. In ducks
and geese fat is more abundant, and of a stronger flavour; they are,
consequently, not so digestible as fowls.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account