I don't know, do you?Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Religion
I don't know, do you?
Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Agnosticism; Free thought
The theology which has been preached for the past few centuries is
not calculated to make men moral. Those ministers who have shouted
themselves hoarse for the salvation of the soul, and who have made no
account of man's behavior in their scheme to save the race, are the
ones who have rubbed humanity in the dirt and undermined the moral
foundations of the world.
* * * * *
Every ethical principle that supports our social structure is
independent of ecclesiastical relations, and it is not essential that
we recognize any theology in order to comprehend the necessity of moral
obedience.
There is no sympathy between right, truth and justice, and the
"Apostles' Creed." We may go so far as to say that the attempt to
establish a perpetual union between Christianity and morality would
result in an absolute divorce of these two forces.
I wish to make it plain beyond a question that the Christian faith, in
itself, is entirely distinct from all moral effort on the part of man.
To believe that Jesus was the Christ does not carry any obligation to
do right; does not make it incumbent upon the believer to do a single
moral action.
It is sufficient to establish our predication that not a single church
in Christendom makes moral character the condition of membership, or
good behavior the way to Heaven.
There is a code of Christian morals which has been taught, but never
practised. The special duties which Jesus enjoined upon his followers
have never been reduced to conduct. It is not too much to say that
the moral precepts of Jesus, if carried into action, would cause
social revolutions beyond precedent, and produce a state of existence
compared with which anarchy would be government, and confusion would be
order.
But, before we undertake to examine the Christian morals, let us shed
a few tears of rejoicing upon the grave of Orthodox theology. We do
not ask to have a coroner's jury decide what caused the death of this
theology. We bless the cause, whatever it was. We only wish to feel
assured that it is really, truly dead, and the fact that "not a single
treatise written by a New England Puritan is a living and authoritative
book" seems to prove it beyond a question. The persons who still preach
this theology and profess to believe it are only "sitting up with the
corpse."
While it is asserted that a wrong interpretation of this theology sent
it out of the world, it is pretty evident that a right understanding of
it inspires no wish to have it back. Much of the superstition in morals
sprang from fear of God, which the Christian church has inculcated as
the highest incentive to right doing.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account