I don't know, do you?Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Religion
I don't know, do you?
Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Agnosticism; Free thought
The truth, broadly and frankly stated, is this: God is no longer the
inspiration of morality. Fear of God does not check the actions of man
today, nor is the attempt to make human and divine interests identical
sufficient to insure obedience to moral laws. The ancient basis of
morals is gone, and another and better one must be found to inspire a
freer life, a fuller life, a better life, and a higher.
We who have rejected the Christian theology are looked upon as orphans.
But, if I understand the position of freethinkers, the question of a
supreme power is neither affirmed nor denied by those who wish to have
no further business with the God of Orthodoxy.
We read that, "the fool hath said in his heart there is no God," but
we prefer to say nothing about the matter. Theologies may come, and
theologies may go, but humanity goes on forever, and so we do not deem
it as important to worship the fleeting shadows of the universe which
are cast upon the minds of men as it is to hold fast to those realities
which make human existence a blessing and "a joy forever."
We are called "infidels" and denounced as "unbelievers" because we
will not march in the ranks of hypocrisy, and dance to the music of
Orthodoxy. We believe no statement which our reason can not approve; we
accept no doctrine which is contrary to commonsense; we have confidence
in human nature; we believe in truth, justice and love; we accept life
as a blessing, and try to make it so; we believe in taking care of
ourselves, in helping others and in being just and kind to all, and we
say to the Christian Church, "If this be Infidelity, make the most of
it."
* * * * *
It is suggested by some that if man's exact relation to the Deity
were understood, the whole question of morals would be settled at
once. But would it not be truer to say that if man's exact relation to
his fellowmen were understood and respected, the highest individual
welfare, no less than the general good, would dictate the morality
which the world needs? And is not this the grand task for the human
race, to rightly interpret the effect of human action upon the
individual and the community, and to deduce from human experience the
rules for human conduct?
I do not know that I owe to God any duty. I do know that I owe a duty
to my neighbor. I plead total indifference to the demands of divine
ethics, but I trust that I am not completely callous to the wants of
my fellow-beings. I owe it to myself to be moral. I owe it to my race,
to every man and woman that I meet in life, to be as honest, as true,
as upright, as my nature will permit. I can comprehend and appreciate
obligations to humanity, but moral indebtedness to the Deity I know
nothing about.
The Christian morals are founded upon the assumption that the work of
man here is to do something that he may escape punishment hereafter,
and hence the morality of the Christian Church has had little
reference to the concerns of the present life.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account