I don't know, do you?Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Religion
I don't know, do you?
Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Agnosticism; Free thought
Christian morality is based upon the Christian faith that the human
race is under the curse of God, and that, to evade the penalty
pronounced upon him, man must perform certain duties--these duties
being taught as paramount to all we owe to self, to family, to society,
and to the world.
But an almost universal disbelief of the Christian dogmas prevails
today, and, consequently, a new morality, with man's welfare for
its supreme object, is fast supplanting the outworn and valueless
performances of Christian duties.
The moral teaching of the New Testament may be the highest and purest
of its kind of teaching, but it is not the kind which is needed today.
It is a false morality, yea, a dead morality for the most part, which
the Christian Church demands of men. The general conviction is that
no salvation is needed by man, and that all the virtues advertised as
requisite for such safety as the Church is prepared to secure, are
spurious virtues.
Those actions which advance man along the way of general prosperity,
which make it easier to live and get a living on the earth, which have
their value determined by their respect for human beings, are what the
world needs.
The generally acknowledged author of Christian morals offers no
salient points for criticism, as he can not be regarded as a historical
person whose career has been carefully followed and marked by the
biographer. He is a mythological man, with a little less of the
fabulous and a little more of the real than attaches to the gods and
goddesses of ancient Greece and Rome.
The name of Jesus adorns an anatomy of words. It pictures a person,
not of flesh and blood, but of faith and fancy. Jesus is a man of the
imagination; but mythical as he is, certain men and women believe
in him in their own way, and are not over-tolerant of those who are
disposed to ask for the proofs of his life and works.
This person has left no more marks of his living upon the earth than
have the birds the marks of their flight through the air. The New
Testament is no more history than is Bunyan's _Pilgrim's Progress_.
We can not make any positive assertions in regard to the life and
character of a man when we do not know who was his father, where or
when he was born, with whom he lived, nor when he died. The only
historical fact connected with Jesus which is not disputed is that Mary
was his mother. This is a very important point in his history, but it
is not sufficient to constitute a biography.
Notwithstanding the fact that the entire narrative of Jesus is without
a single chronological date, and the vastly more significant fact that
not a single incident connected with the career of Jesus is mentioned
in contemporaneous history, we must perforce speak of him as a person
whose life was watched and noted from his miraculous advent to his
miraculous ascension, and look upon his disciples as so many Boswells
ready to mirror to the world his every speech and act.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account