I don't know, do you?Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Religion
I don't know, do you?
Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Agnosticism; Free thought
And the dogma regarding Jesus is inextricably mixed up in Christian
theology with that of the Atonement. One assumption bolsters the
other. He is made to occupy the central place in this scheme of
blood-redemption through that other highly rational fable of the
immaculate conception. If Jesus was not immaculately conceived, then
Matthew and Luke have deceived; then Jesus is not God; then he is a
mere man; and if so, he is not the Redeemer. Man could not redeem
himself according to the first premise of the scheme. Man has been and
_is_ redeeming himself by learning Nature's laws and through them
rising to a higher life ever since he reached the stage of humanity.
Take the theory of the Resurrection. The account of it was written long
after the assumed occurrence, and by credulous men with superstitious
inclinations. Men and women of these days, understanding the laws of
Nature, can not give assent to the crude beliefs which easily commanded
the minds of ancient times.
Both Protestantism and Catholicism are systems built on essentially the
same foundation. Remove any of these stones, and the systems will have
to be rebuilt. If there is no special revelation, there is no special
scheme of salvation. If there is no vengeful, blood-seeking God, there
is no theological reconciliation. If there was no fall, there is no
hopeless depravity. If there was no immaculate conception, there is
no Redeemer in a special ecclesiastical sense. If there is no total
depravity, there is no lost world. If there is no lost world, there is
no yawning Hell. One and all, these fictions have their only ground for
continuance in a _selfish_ and unreasoning priesthood and clergy, and a
credulous people.
In the place of the "fall," science has put the "rise" of man. It finds
the Garden of Eden to have been a jungle. It finds the mythical perfect
Adam to have been a savage. It finds the Biblical "origin of evil"
to have been a puerile legend. It finds that sin and evil are made by
the seeing of higher states. It finds that there was no bad until the
better was reached. It finds that it is the advancing good which makes
the existing bad. It finds that among the worst of sinners are those
who live in and propagate outworn doctrines upon their own and others'
credulity.
In the olden times, God was made a king--the world was his kingdom.
His powers, virtues and vices were simply those of earthly kings
exaggerated. Jewish and Christian liturgies are full of expressions
showing the attitude of slaves and serfs to a tyrant. Sin has been
manufactured as heresy and disobedience to the so-called orthodox
system instead of to the laws of Nature.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account