I don't know, do you?Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Religion
I don't know, do you?
Ricker, Marilla M. (Marilla Marks)
Agnosticism; Free thought
Science has shown that the bottomless pit did not even have a top.
Columbus sailed over the Western edge of the flat Christian world on
which all this Christian system depended, and found that the material
Heaven and Hell were unfounded myths; but the preachers and priests
still threaten _hell_ to the most ignorant and credulous, but they tell
some of us that there is a _final judgment_.
* * * * *
In the old days, we used to hear a great deal about judgments. A
certain honest, good-natured, old farmer in New Hampshire, who was a
freethinker, but had a very pious wife, lost many cattle when the
black tongue was an epidemic in the State.
One day the hired man came in and told him the red oxen were dead.
"Are they?" said the old man. "Well, they were 'breechy cusses.' Take
off their hides and carry them down to Fletcher's. They will bring the
cash."
An hour or so later the man came back with the news that Lineback and
his mate were both dead.
"Are they?" said the old man. "Well, I took them of B---- to save a bad
debt that I never expected to get. Take the hides down to Fletcher's.
They will bring the cash."
After the lapse of another hour the man came back to tell him that the
nigh brindle was dead.
"Is he?" said the old man. "Well, he was a very old ox. Take off his
hide and send it down to Fletcher's. It is worth cash and will bring
more than two of the others."
Hereupon his wife reminded him that his loss was a judgment of Heaven
upon him.
"Is it?" said the old chap. "Well, if they will take the judgment in
cattle, it is the easiest way I can pay it."
But they know no more about final judgments than they did about the
lake of fire and brimstone which commenced to drain off in Columbus'
day. Science has vaporized the notion of a future judgment by the same
method it has that of a past Creation. From the _facts_, it has learned
_laws_. But credulity is always half-hearted with facts. It does not
know enough of truth to love it. It is ever glowing over and setting
up as a dogma the little it knows, or assumes to know, of the truth of
former times. It has no faith in the newly discovered, because it knows
nothing of it.
Hence, age after age we see the spectacle of men who have not studied
the science of their own day denouncing it in pulpit and councils;
of men who have steeped themselves in the traditions of the past
pronouncing shallow invectives against the demonstrations of (science)
the present.
* * * * *
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account