Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard ShawHuneker, James
History
Iconoclasts: A Book of Dramatists: Ibsen, Strindberg, Becque, Hauptmann, Sudermann, Hervieu, Gorky, Duse and D'Annunzio, Maeterlinck and Bernard Shaw
Huneker, James
Dramatists; European drama -- 19th century -- History and criticism; European drama -- 20th century -- History and criticism
Biologists believe that after forty a man of genius--who is in
Darwinian parlance a _sport_--returns to his tribe; resumes in himself
the traits of his parents. Perhaps Strindberg has reached the grand
climacteric and may give us less disturbing masterpieces. In 1902,
under the title of Elf Einakter, a German translation of eleven of
his one-act plays was published. This collection contains the ripest
offering thus far of his unquestionable genius. It begins with Gräfin
Julie, condensed by the dramatist into a one-act piece. "A tragedy of
naturalism," he calls it. It is an emotional bombshell. The social
world seems topsy-turvied after a first reading. After a second, while
the gripping power does not relax, one realizes the writer's deep,
almost abysmal knowledge of human nature. Imagine a Joseph Andrews
made love to by a Lady Booby, youthful, fascinating. But Fielding
aims light shafts of satire; Strindberg calls up ghosts with haunting
eyes. Passion there is, and a horrible atmosphere of reality. You
know the affair has happened; you see the valet, Jean, chucking his
cook-sweetheart under the chin as she feeds him with dainties in the
kitchen; you witness the appearance on the scene of Julie enamoured;
frantic, unhappy Julie; and you view the crumbling of her soul,
depicted as in one of those drawings of Giulio Romano from which you
avert your head. The finale makes Ghosts an entertainment for urchins.
Everything is brought about naturally, inevitably. Be it understood,
Strindberg is never pornographic, nor does he show a naked soul merely
to afford charming diversion, which is the practice of some French
dramatists.
What would our Ibsen-hating critics say after Gräfin Julie or
Gläubiger! That kitchen--fancy a kitchen as a battlefield of
souls!--with its good-hearted and pious cook, the impudent scoundrel of
a valet eager for revenge on his superiors, and the hallucinated girl
from above stairs--it is a tiny epic of hatred, of class against mass.
Julie is neurotic. She has coolly snapped the betrothal vows made with
a titled young man of the district It is St. John's Eve. The villa of
the Count, Julie's father, is empty save for the two servants, Jean and
Christina--the latter is the cook. Julie, bored by her colourless life
and fevered by a midsummer's madness, throws herself at the valet's
head. He is frightened. His servant nature has the upper hand until the
pair, forced to hide because of the intrusion of rough country folk,
reappear. Then the male brute is smirking, triumphant. Justin Huntly
McCarthy made a translation of the piece for an English magazine in
1892. Here is an excerpt:--
[JULIE _enters, sees the disorder in the kitchen, and clasps her hands.
Then she lakes a powder puff and powders her face._]
JEAN. [_Enters excited_] There, you see and you hear. Do you still
think it possible to remain here?
JULIE. No, I do not. But what shall we do?
JEAN. Fly; travel; fly away from here.
JULIE. Travel? Yes! But where?
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account