Idle Ideas in 1905Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
General
Idle Ideas in 1905
Jerome, Jerome K. (Jerome Klapka)
English essays; English wit and humor
And you, sweet Dora, let me confess I love you, though sensible friends
deem you foolish. Ah, silly Dora, fashioned by wise Mother Nature who
knows that weakness and helplessness are as a talisman calling forth
strength and tenderness in man, trouble yourself not unduly about the
oysters and the underdone mutton, little woman. Good plain cooks at
twenty pounds a year will see to these things for us. Your work is to
teach us gentleness and kindness. Lay your foolish curls just here,
child. It is from such as you we learn wisdom. Foolish wise folk sneer
at you. Foolish wise folk would pull up the laughing lilies, the
needless roses from the garden, would plant in their places only useful,
wholesome cabbage. But the gardener, knowing better, plants the silly,
short-lived flowers, foolish wise folk asking for what purpose.
Gallant Traddles, of the strong heart and the unruly hair; Sophy, dearest
of girls; Betsy Trotwood, with your gentlemanly manners and your woman’s
heart, you have come to me in shabby rooms, making the dismal place seem
bright. In dark hours your kindly faces have looked out at me from the
shadows, your kindly voices have cheered me.
Little Em’ly and Agnes, it may be my bad taste, but I cannot share my
friend Dickens’ enthusiasm for them. Dickens’ good women are all too
good for human nature’s daily food. Esther Summerson, Florence Dombey,
Little Nell—you have no faults to love you by.
Scott’s women were likewise mere illuminated texts. Scott only drew one
live heroine—Catherine Seton. His other women were merely the prizes the
hero had to win in the end, like the sucking pig or the leg of mutton for
which the yokel climbs the greasy pole. That Dickens could draw a woman
to some likeness he proved by Bella Wilfer, and Estella in “Great
Expectations.” But real women have never been popular in fiction. Men
readers prefer the false, and women readers object to the truth.
From an artistic point of view, “David Copperfield” is undoubtedly
Dickens’ best work. Its humour is less boisterous; its pathos less
highly coloured.
One of Leech’s pictures represents a cab-man calmly sleeping in the
gutter.
“Oh, poor dear, he’s ill,” says a tender-hearted lady in the crowd.
“Ill!” retorts a male bystander indignantly, “Ill! ’E’s ’ad too much of
what I ain’t ’ad enough of.”
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account