Il nipotismo di Roma, or, The History of the Popes Nephews: from the time of Sixtus IV. to the death of the last Pope, Alexander VIILeti, Gregorio
History
Il nipotismo di Roma, or, The History of the Popes Nephews: from the time of Sixtus IV. to the death of the last Pope, Alexander VII
Leti, Gregorio
Nepotism; Papacy -- Early works to 1800; Papacy -- History
There hath been some Popes, who while they were Bishops and Cardinals did
reckon an incredible number of Nephews and Cozens; and yet no sooner were
they promoted to the highest Prelature, but all their kindred vanished
and disappeared, as if they had never had any.
If in those times you had asked any of them if they were a-kin to the
Pope, he would have denyed it openly, so little did the Popes care for
their kindred, and their kindred for them: The cause of this was, that
the Popes did not measure in their kindred their deserts, by any carnal
affection they had for them, but compared their merits by the Standard of
Christian perfection; so that if a Kinsman of a Pope should have happened
to have had, for competitour in any place, one not much above him in
learning and piety, yet without doubt he should have yielded to this his
Competitour, and gone without his pretensions.
Hence it came, that the Popes kindred, that they might not receive
affronts in _Rome_, did forbear to come at the City; and least the world
should by their absence conclude of the meanness of their deserts, they
would give it out, that they were in no wayes related to the Pope, whose
kindred they were, saving thus their honour without honour.
In those times, the Popes did often resist the Emperours tyrannical
proceedings, and withstood their injuries, not with Armies and Fleets,
but with Zeal and Piety they did boldly oppose their vices and
corruptions; as amongst others, _Gregory_ the seventh excommunicated the
Emperour _Henry_, and banished him from all commerce with the rest of his
Christians, only because he had received I know not what sum of money
from a Bishop, who us’d his favour to be preferr’d to a vacant
Bishoprick.
_Rome_ was then truly holy without ambition, and without gold; and
glorious were the Popes, who with their zeal and good actions made
barbarous Kings tremble, and Tyrants humble themselves to the yoak of
Christian Religion; and indeed who would not obey that Pope, that should
prefer true merit and deserts before Relations and Kindred, Vertue before
Vice, Learning before Ignorance, Zeal before Ambition, Poverty before
Riches, his flock before his Kindred, and Justice before Favour and
Recommendations?
But if hitherto we have spoken of _Rome_ without corruption, and of Popes
full of zeal and holiness, so we must now consider _Rome_ under another
habit, that is, not holy, but wicked, not pure and innocent, but defiled
and full of ambition and avarice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account