Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
Or if the ghost had first appeared to a magistrate: should we not have
been told how much more probable it was that a magistrate should bear
a part in some artifice which afforded him profit, than that a miracle
had happened equal to the transition from a state of manhood to that
which preceded our birth? It is no dishonor to the most illustrious
of mankind that they frequently entertain the same opinion as that
of their inferiors. On the mode of conduct proper for a Spectre, our
authors agree in sentiment with that Heroine of a famous English
ballad,[7] who with the habiliments there described, frightened
a person into compliance at once. She gave him no opportunity to
deliberate or to authenticate her mission. Compliance, or immediate
ruin were his only alternative. Her name was honored by three queens,
and the favor of Henry the eighth.
Spectres from heaven are rational creatures, and come down from the
fountain of reason, and will therefore deal reasonably with us, by
allowing us a fair opportunity to ascertain the reality of their
mission. But for this examination, the mind is incapable when terrified
by a sudden surprise.
Eleanor Welsh being the mother of the injured, must have been
interested, and therefore, if the Spectre had first appeared to her and
her husband, there certainly would have been less evidence of reality
(coct. par) than there was by its first appearing to Tavernor, who, by
the very supposition of our author, was a disinterested person, and
“had no concern in the matter.”
We find in the next place several naked assertions, and then the
inference that, “The evidence of Spectres is destroyed.” They tell us
that Spectres appear only to one person at a time--that they are seen
only in the night, and visible only to the illiterate and credulous. “A
man must be prejudiced in favor of this opinion beforehand, say they,
or he will never see a ghost.”
I must not offend the reader by needless detention. He may easily
find instances to disprove these assertions. As to the last, besides
Doctor Scott, several persons of distinguished abilities, probity and
literature, who have seen ghosts, have declared to the writer, that
instead of previously believing their existence, their minds had been
strongly prejudiced against it.
Our authors desire to know why Spectres should appear in the night,
and “why they could not deliver their messages with as much ease and
more success in the day time.” And doubtless Bolingbroke had a similar
enquiry respecting the angel who appeared to the shepherds in the night.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account