Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
“To render the testimony of any person credible, say these writers,
he must not only be a man of veracity, but of sufficient ability to
judge of the subject to which he is to bear witness. It is not on the
evidence of an ignorant, illiterate person, who has more fancy and fear
than judgment, that we are to rest our belief of what is supernatural.”
Here again their weapon is from the arsenal of those who oppose our
Saviour’s resurrection, known first to some of “the timorous and
pious sex,” as Hume has termed them, and then to illiterate, ignorant
fishermen, who, say the deists, had more fancy and fear than judgment.
The truth is, some ignorant men have no more fancy nor fear than the
learned, and a much better judgment than many of the latter. The
corporeal senses of the illiterate are as infallible as those of the
learned. The former can see and hear a ghost or an angel as distinctly
as the latter, and can attempt to handle a ghost with as much composure
of mind, and so are capable of knowing whether they can feel a
substance or not, as a Locke or a Newton.
On the whole, it appears that the reason why mankind in this
enlightened age, must believe that apparitions are a mere fiction,
is not because this negative thesis was ever established by any
solid demonstration, but because the unanimity of modern names, the
substitute of argument, has given it popularity.
Doubtless the counterfeit apparitions which duped the popish ages, were
numerous; but counterfeits will never prove that there is nothing to be
counterfeited.
Among the greatest impositions of this nature, where shall we find one,
which will compare with the late events of Sullivan, in the county
of Hancock, Maine. In that place has never been found any theatrical
representation, or magic glass, or lantern, or ventriloquist, or
speaking automaton, or Phantasmagoria, or Statue of Kircher: and
were all these means of imposition found there, they would afford no
rational explanation of the subsequent phenomena. How easy of solution
was that fraud in the city of Bern, mentioned by Mosheim,[8] as imposed
upon one Jetzer, by four Dominicans, to confirm their doctrine of
original sin. The apparition was indeed terrific, and exhibited false
miracles, but never offered to appear in the day time, nor predict any
event, which could not be foreknown by other means, nor was there any
address to the sense of feeling to satisfy Jetzer that the Spectre was
a Phantom.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account