Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre — John Shaqi
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectreCummings, Abraham
Religion
Immortality proved by the testimony of sense : $b In which is contemplated the doctrine of spectres and the existence of a particular spectre
Cummings, Abraham
Apparitions; Immortality; Spiritualism
of this enlightened age, signifies that after we, as persons, have
been annihilated for some ages, a number of new persons, just then
created, who shall be our very selves, will be present with the Lord.
But in view of the simple christian, who knows but little, the plain
meaning of the text is, that in the very same hour and minute, while
we are absent from this corruptible body, we are present with the
Lord. Such an ignorant christian is not able to conceive how a person,
and a similar person residing on the two opposite shores of the vast
duration of nihility, can be one and the same person, any more than to
conceive how a person and a similar person, residing at the same time
on the opposite shores of the vast Atlantic, can be one and the same
person. Our Lord said to the penitent thief, “This day shalt thou be
with me in paradise;” that is, before the close of this natural day
thou shalt be with me in heaven. So the penitent thief in his state
of ignorance would naturally understand it. But Priestlian subtilty
requires this paraphrase, “This day shalt thou die, soul and body,
and remain personally annihilated about two thousand years.” Then
a person entirely new shall begin to exist, and shall erroneously
imagine that within a few months he had committed a theft, that within
a few hours he had been crucified, and obtained a promise which was
now completely fulfilled. All this deception will take place, because
he will be you. However, by intercourse with others, he and you will
discover these chronological errors, and that those things which you
had done, suffered and enjoyed, took place about two thousand years
before you, that is, before the second you, existed. It was well
for the thief that he knew not, and believed not, this paraphrase;
otherwise that promise would have been a poor, cold consolation to
him. The Sadducees denied the resurrection, and the existence of angel
and spirit, and their denial of the former was grounded on their
denial of the latter. They seemed to admit, that, if spirits existed
in a separate state, they might assume bodies. But as there _were_ no
such spirits in their view, the inference was certain, that no such
transition could take place. Therefore the argument of our Saviour
attacked the very foundation of their theory, by shewing that the
patriarchs, though dead for many years, and their bodies not raised,
were still alive, while Moses stood at the burning bush.[3] Our Lord
cited these words, addressed to Moses at that time, “I am the God
of Abraham, the God of Isaac, and the God of Jacob;” and then says,
“God is not the God of the dead, but of the living, for all live unto
him.” That is to say, they do not live unto man. In his natural view,
they are dead in every respect. They see no life in his body, nor any
where else; still they live unto God. In his view they have life,
thought, affection and intelligence. Therefore those dead patriarchs
were alive at the time when Moses beheld the burning bush.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account