Sexism; Women -- Social and moral questions; Women -- Social conditions
This sentimentality in marriage is seldom, if ever, observed in women.
For reasons that we shall examine later, they have much more to gain by
the business than men, and so they are prompted by their cooler
sagacity to enter upon it on the most favourable terms possible, and
with the minimum admixture of disarming emotion. Men almost invariably
get their mates by the process called falling in love; save among the
aristocracies of the North and Latin men, the marriage of convenience
is relatively rare; a hundred men marry “beneath” them to every woman
who perpetrates the same folly. And what is meant by this so-called
falling in love? What is meant by it is a procedure whereby a man
accounts for the fact of his marriage, after feminine initiative and
generalship have made it inevitable, by enshrouding it in a purple maze
of romance—in brief, by setting up the doctrine that an obviously
self-possessed and mammalian woman, engaged deliberately in the most
important adventure of her life, and with the keenest understanding of
its utmost implications, is a naive, tender, moony and almost
disembodied creature, enchanted and made perfect by a passion that has
stolen upon her unawares, and which she could not acknowledge, even to
herself, without blushing to death. By this preposterous doctrine, the
defeat and enslavement of the man is made glorious, and even gifted
with a touch of flattering naughtiness. The sheer horsepower of his
wooing has assailed and overcome her maiden modesty; she trembles in
his arms; he has been granted a free franchise to work his wicked will
upon her. Thus do the ambulant images of God cloak their shackles
proudly, and divert the judicious with their boastful shouts.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account