"Oi, Tetvin, Tetvin!" This was the name of the previous speaker.
"Consider the sense, not the sound of thy words. Thou art able to unite
folly with reason! To-day it seems to thee that thou wilt predict luck
from a few faded cards. Not true! When the moment comes and thy breast
aches about the heart, thou wilt yearn honestly for happiness in love.
For example, in Lithuania, I have a pair of old people in a cottage, my
father and mother, as white as doves, and one of them says to the other
things of me which are beyond my merits, things which might be told of a
golden king's son. What would my worth be were I to shut myself up in a
book, not think of them, and neglect them in their old age? None
whatever.--Well, I come here and I forget neither science nor them nor
myself. And I am not alone. Every man who tills a field has the right to
eat bread from it. That to begin with! Science is science; let not a
scholar tear himself loose from life, let him not be an incompetent. A
scholar is a scholar; but if he cannot button his shirt, if he does not
support his own children, and has no care for his wife? Why not
reconcile the practice of life with science? Why not bring science into
one's career and enliven science itself with life?"
Thus spoke Vasilkevich. He spoke and panted with excitement.
The point is not in this whether he spoke truth or falsehood; we have
repeated the conversation because Yosef, by nature inclined to be
practical, took it to heart; he considered, meditated, thought, and
chose the medical course.
Happen what may, a man brings to the world certain tendencies.
Yosef's mind was realistic by nature, in some way he clung rather to
things than ideas--he had therefore no love for dialectics of any sort.
He preferred greatly to see an object as it was, and had no wish to have
it seem better than it was. The movement of mind in men's heads is of
two sorts: one starts eternally from the centre of existence, the other
refers each object to some other. Men of the first kind enter into
things already investigated, and give them life by connecting them with
the main source of existence by a very slender thread of knowledge. The
first are the so-called creative capacities; the second grasp things in
some fashion, compare them, classify them, and understand them only
through arranging and bringing them into classes,--those are the
scientific capacities. The first men are born to create, the second to
investigate. The difference between them is like that between a
spendthrift and a miser, between exhaling and inhaling. It is difficult
to tell which is the better: the first have the gift of creating; the
second of developing, and above all of digesting. In the second this is
active; true, the stomach has that power also. A perfect balance between
these powers constitutes genius. In such a case there is a natural need
of broad movements.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account