Indian Nullification of the Unconstitutional Laws of Massachusetts Relative to the Marshpee Tribe: Or, the Pretended Riot ExplainedApess, William
History
Indian Nullification of the Unconstitutional Laws of Massachusetts Relative to the Marshpee Tribe: Or, the Pretended Riot Explained
Apess, William
Indians of North America -- Legal status, laws, etc.; Mashpee Indians -- Land tenure; Mashpee Indians -- Legal status, laws, etc.
The undersigned beg leave to represent in aid of the petition
of the Selectmen and School Committee of the District of
Marshpee, praying for a specific appropriation from the School
Fund for the support of public schools in said district, that
we are acquainted with the facts set forth in said petition,
and believe that the cause of education could no where be more
promoted in any District in the Commonwealth than by making
a specific annual allowance to said Marshpee District. The
Legislature have made a specific annual appropriation of
fifty dollars to the Indians on Martha's Vineyard for public
schools, and the undersigned are of opinion, that an annual
appropriation of double that amount, would be no more than a
fair relative proportion for the District of Marshpee. It is
highly important that the District should be able to employ
competent white teachers, until they can find a sufficient
number of good teachers among themselves, which cannot be
expected until they have enjoyed greater means of education
than heretofore. The undersigned therefore pray that the
petition of said Selectmen may be granted, by giving a
specific annual allowance to said District.
BENJ. F. HALLETT, Counsel for the Marshpee Indians.
CHARLES MARSTON, Commissioner of Marshpee.
Here it will be seen that the missionary for the Indians on Martha's
Vineyard, did not go to sleep over his flock, or run after others
and neglect what ought to be his own fold, as did the missionary,
Mr. Fish, whom Harvard College sent to the Marshpees, and pays for
preaching to white men. Mr. Bayley, the white missionary on the
Vineyard, as I understand, took pains to send a petition to Boston,
and he got fifty dollars a year for our brethren there, of which we
are glad. From all we can judge of Mr. Fish, we should have sooner
expected that instead of trying to help our schools, he would opposed
our getting any thing for schools, as he also opposed our getting our
liberty. He has done nothing for us, about our schools, and even tried
to set the Indians against their counsel, Mr. Hallett, by pretending
he had lost his influence. When Mr. Fish does as much for our liberty,
and for our schools, as Mr. Hallett has done, we will listen to his
advice.
Public-domain text, read in full here on John Shaqi.
Reviews
Reviews
No reviews yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this work.
Elsewhere in the archive
Join the Discussion
Join the discussion
Sign in to leave a comment or review.
Sign InorCreate an account